Literature DB >> 12739092

Delayed flanker effects on lateralized readiness potentials.

Uwe Mattler1.   

Abstract

When participants were required to respond to a relevant central target and ignore irrelevant flanking stimuli, the flankers produced a response compatibility effect. Electrophysiological studies have shown that irrelevant flanker stimuli can affect the motor system. The present experiments further examined the characteristics of flanker effects on the motor system. Sixty participants responded in the flanker task to arrows (experiment 1) or letters (experiment 2). To examine time and extent of flanker effects on the motor system, target onset was delayed with blocked or random stimulus-onset asynchronies (SOA). With SOA of 0 and 100 ms, flanker effects on behavioral measures were reduced in random as compared to blocked conditions, but enhanced with SOA of 400 ms. With SOA of 400 ms, flanker effects on the early lateralized readiness potentials (LRP) were reduced in blocked as compared to random conditions, indicating that the onset of flanker effects on the LRP was delayed. Response-locked LRPs suggest that flanker and target stimuli activate the motor system successively. Findings challenge current theories of the flanker compatibility effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12739092     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1486-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes.

Authors:  J Miller; S A Hackley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1992-06

2.  Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: a psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow.

Authors:  H G Smid; G Mulder; L J Mulder
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1990-08

3.  The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-03

4.  Priming effects in perceptual classification.

Authors:  J H Flowers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-02

5.  N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control.

Authors:  B Kopp; F Rist; U Mattler
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  M Eimer; F Schlaghecken
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming.

Authors:  B Kopp; U Mattler; R Goertz; F Rist
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-07

Review 9.  Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: theoretical distinctions and empirical results.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1988-06

10.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  17 in total

1.  Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: conflict adaptation or associative priming?

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; John F Stins; Danielle Posthuma; Tinca J C Polderman; Dorret I Boomsma; Eco J de Geus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-09

2.  Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in Parkinson's disease: a psychophysiological analysis.

Authors:  M Falkenstein; R Willemssen; J Hohnsbein; H Hielscher
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Tracking the first two seconds: three stages of visual information processing?

Authors:  Jane Jacob; Bruno G Breitmeyer; Melissa Treviño
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

4.  The time course of distractor-based response activation with predictable and unpredictable target onset.

Authors:  Kerstin Jost; Mike Wendt; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Andreas Löw; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-02-02

5.  On the time-course of automatic response activation in the Simon task.

Authors:  Ruben Ellinghaus; Matthias Karlbauer; Karin M Bausenhart; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-07

6.  Strategic allocation of attention reduces temporally predictable stimulus conflict.

Authors:  L Gregory Appelbaum; Carsten N Boehler; Robert Won; Lauren Davis; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Eriksen flanker delta plot shapes depend on the stimulus.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The effect of Parkinson's disease on interference control during action selection.

Authors:  S A Wylie; W P M van den Wildenberg; K R Ridderinkhof; T R Bashore; V D Powell; C A Manning; G F Wooten
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Dos and don'ts in response priming research.

Authors:  Filipp Schmidt; Anke Haberkamp; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-12-22

10.  Evidence inhibition responds reactively to the salience of distracting information during focused attention.

Authors:  Natalie Wyatt; Liana Machado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.