Literature DB >> 15945205

Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory?

Evan F Risko1, Jennifer A Stolz, Derek Besner.   

Abstract

Visual word recognition is commonly argued to be automatic in the sense that it is obligatory and ballistic. The present experiments combined Stroop and visual search paradigms to provide a novel test of this claim. An array of three, five, or seven words including one colored target (a word in Experiments 1 and 2, a bar in Experiment 3) was presented to participants. An irrelevant color word also appeared in the display and was either integrated with or separated from the colored target. The participants classified the color of the single colored item in Experiments 1 and 3 and determined whether a target color was present or absent in Experiment 2. A Stroop effect was observed in Experiment 1 when the color word and the color target were integral, but not when the color word and the color target were separated. No Stroop effect was observed in Experiment 2. Visual word recognition is contingent on both the distribution of spatial attention and task demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15945205     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

1.  Visual word recognition: reattending to the role of spatial attention.

Authors:  J A Stolz; R S McCann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?

Authors:  Tracy L Brown; Christopher L Gore; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-06

3.  Translation and competition among internal representations in a reverse Stroop effect.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-04

4.  The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-03

Review 5.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.

Authors:  C M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries.

Authors:  A Treisman; S Gormican
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.

Authors:  N Lavie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  D Kahneman; D Chajczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Toward a translational model of Stroop interference.

Authors:  R A Virzi; H E Egeth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-07

10.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Laurie A Manwell; Martha Anne Roberts; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

2.  Novel Symbol Learning-Induced Stroop Effect: Evidence for a Strategy-Based, Utility Learning Model.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Huijun Tang; Yuan Deng
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-10

3.  Extending the simultaneous-sequential paradigm to measure perceptual capacity for features and words.

Authors:  Alec Scharff; John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The magic of words reconsidered: Investigating the automaticity of reading color-neutral words in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Bianca De Wit; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Differential effects of viewing positions on standard versus semantic Stroop interference.

Authors:  Ludovic Ferrand; Maria Augustinova
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

6.  Mind wandering in text comprehension under dual-task conditions.

Authors:  Peter Dixon; Henry Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-01

7.  Is reading automatic? Are the ERP correlates of masked priming really lexical?

Authors:  Dennis Norris; Sachiko Kinoshita; Jane Hall; Richard Henson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.331

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.