Literature DB >> 12026943

The importance of irrelevant-dimension variability in the stroop flanker task.

Sharon Morein-Zamir1, Avishai Henik, Idit Spitzer-Davidson.   

Abstract

Two experiments in which the Stroop flanker task was used were conducted in order to examine the influence of irrelevant dimension invariance on congruency effects. Participants responded manually to a central color patch flanked by a Stroop stimulus. In Experiment 1, invariance in flanker location was found to have no influence on word and color congruency effects. In contrast, invariance of flanker identity led to the disappearance of congruency effects. Experiment 2 indicated that the elimination of a congruency effect was restricted to the dimension that remained constant and did not influence the congruency effect of the other dimension that was presented at the same location. Results suggest that variance is a prerequisite to congruity effects, determining the activation of irrelevant dimensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12026943     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  22 in total

1.  What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect?

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

2.  Evidence for early selection: precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors.

Authors:  L Paquet; C Lortie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

3.  Processes underlying dimensional interactions: correspondences between linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions.

Authors:  R D Melara; L E Marks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-09

4.  The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-03

5.  Dimensional interactions in language processing: investigating directions and levels of crosstalk.

Authors:  R D Melara; L E Marks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The perception of number from the separability of the stimulus: the Stroop effect revisited.

Authors:  D Algom; A Dekel; A Pansky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-09

7.  Mapping symbols to response modalities: interference effects on Stroop-like tasks.

Authors:  J V Baldo; A P Shimamura; W Prinzmetal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-04

8.  Interference and facilitation for color naming with separate bilateral presentations of the word and color.

Authors:  F N Dyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-08

9.  Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice.

Authors:  R D Melara; J R Mounts
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-09

10.  Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.

Authors:  M O Glaser; W R Glaser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sequential analysis of the numerical Stroop effect reveals response suppression.

Authors:  Roi Cohen Kadosh; Wim Gevers; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.051

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.