Literature DB >> 20063051

Experimental validation of the influence of white matter anisotropy on the intracranial EEG forward solution.

Nitin B Bangera1, Donald L Schomer, Nima Dehghani, Istvan Ulbert, Sydney Cash, Steve Papavasiliou, Solomon R Eisenberg, Anders M Dale, Eric Halgren.   

Abstract

Forward solutions with different levels of complexity are employed for localization of current generators, which are responsible for the electric and magnetic fields measured from the human brain. The influence of brain anisotropy on the forward solution is poorly understood. The goal of this study is to validate an anisotropic model for the intracranial electric forward solution by comparing with the directly measured 'gold standard'. Dipolar sources are created at known locations in the brain and intracranial electroencephalogram (EEG) is recorded simultaneously. Isotropic models with increasing level of complexity are generated along with anisotropic models based on Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). A Finite Element Method based forward solution is calculated and validated using the measured data. Major findings are (1) An anisotropic model with a linear scaling between the eigenvalues of the electrical conductivity tensor and water self-diffusion tensor in brain tissue is validated. The greatest improvement was obtained when the stimulation site is close to a region of high anisotropy. The model with a global anisotropic ratio of 10:1 between the eigenvalues (parallel: tangential to the fiber direction) has the worst performance of all the anisotropic models. (2) Inclusion of cerebrospinal fluid as well as brain anisotropy in the forward model is necessary for an accurate description of the electric field inside the skull. The results indicate that an anisotropic model based on the DTI can be constructed non-invasively and shows an improved performance when compared to the isotropic models for the calculation of the intracranial EEG forward solution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20063051      PMCID: PMC2912982          DOI: 10.1007/s10827-009-0205-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  32 in total

1.  Multiple microelectrode-recording system for human intracortical applications.

Authors:  I Ulbert; E Halgren; G Heit; G Karmos
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2001-03-30       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements.

Authors:  T F Oostendorp; J Delbeke; D F Stegeman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  The influence of brain tissue anisotropy on human EEG and MEG.

Authors:  J Haueisen; D S Tuch; C Ramon; P H Schimpf; V J Wedeen; J S George; J W Belliveau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  A model of the electrical volume conductor in the region of the eye in the ELF range.

Authors:  G Lindenblatt; J Silny
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Conductivity tensor mapping of the human brain using diffusion tensor MRI.

Authors:  D S Tuch; V J Wedeen; A M Dale; J S George; J W Belliveau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Patient-specific analysis of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Scott E Cooper; Jaimie M Henderson; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

Authors:  Daniel R Merrill; Marom Bikson; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.

Authors:  C H Wolters; A Anwander; X Tricoche; D Weinstein; M A Koch; R S MacLeod
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Conductivity of living intracranial tissues.

Authors:  J Latikka; T Kuurne; H Eskola
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Clinical utility of current-generation dipole modelling of scalp EEG.

Authors:  C Plummer; L Litewka; S Farish; A S Harvey; M J Cook
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  17 in total

1.  Differences in MEG and EEG power-law scaling explained by a coupling between spatial coherence and frequency: a simulation study.

Authors:  C G Bénar; C Grova; V K Jirsa; J M Lina
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Complex propagation patterns characterize human cortical activity during slow-wave sleep.

Authors:  Balázs Hangya; Benedek T Tihanyi; László Entz; Dániel Fabó; Loránd Erőss; Lucia Wittner; Rita Jakus; Viktor Varga; Tamás F Freund; István Ulbert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Computationally optimized ECoG stimulation with local safety constraints.

Authors:  Seyhmus Guler; Moritz Dannhauer; Biel Roig-Solvas; Alexis Gkogkidis; Rob Macleod; Tonio Ball; Jeffrey G Ojemann; Dana H Brooks
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Regional electric field induced by electroconvulsive therapy in a realistic finite element head model: influence of white matter anisotropic conductivity.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Zhi-De Deng; Tae-Seong Kim; Andrew F Laine; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Influence of trainee participation on operative times for adult and pediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Sidharth V Puram; Elliott D Kozin; Rosh Kv Sethi; Ariel E Hight; Mark G Shrime; Stacey T Gray; Michael S Cohen; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2014-11-11

Review 6.  Epileptogenic focus localization in treatment-resistant post-traumatic epilepsy.

Authors:  Andrei Irimia; John Darrell Van Horn
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 7.  The roadmap for estimation of cell-type-specific neuronal activity from non-invasive measurements.

Authors:  Hana Uhlirova; Kıvılcım Kılıç; Peifang Tian; Sava Sakadžić; Louis Gagnon; Martin Thunemann; Michèle Desjardins; Payam A Saisan; Krystal Nizar; Mohammad A Yaseen; Donald J Hagler; Matthieu Vandenberghe; Srdjan Djurovic; Ole A Andreassen; Gabriel A Silva; Eliezer Masliah; David Kleinfeld; Sergei Vinogradov; Richard B Buxton; Gaute T Einevoll; David A Boas; Anders M Dale; Anna Devor
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Visualizing simulated electrical fields from electroencephalography and transcranial electric brain stimulation: a comparative evaluation.

Authors:  Sebastian Eichelbaum; Moritz Dannhauer; Mario Hlawitschka; Dana Brooks; Thomas R Knösche; Gerik Scheuermann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The Influence of the Head Model Conductor on the Source Localization of Auditory Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Stefania Conte; John E Richards
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  A hitchhiker's guide to diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  José M Soares; Paulo Marques; Victor Alves; Nuno Sousa
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.