Literature DB >> 11771984

The influence of brain tissue anisotropy on human EEG and MEG.

J Haueisen1, D S Tuch, C Ramon, P H Schimpf, V J Wedeen, J S George, J W Belliveau.   

Abstract

The influence of gray and white matter tissue anisotropy on the human electroencephalogram (EEG) and magnetoencephalogram (MEG) was examined with a high resolution finite element model of the head of an adult male subject. The conductivity tensor data for gray and white matter were estimated from magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging. Simulations were carried out with single dipoles or small extended sources in the cortical gray matter. The inclusion of anisotropic volume conduction in the brain was found to have a minor influence on the topology of EEG and MEG (and hence source localization). We found a major influence on the amplitude of EEG and MEG (and hence source strength estimation) due to the change in conductivity and the inclusion of anisotropy. We expect that inclusion of tissue anisotropy information will improve source estimation procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11771984     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  55 in total

1.  Influence of heterogeneous and anisotropic tissue conductivity on electric field distribution in deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Mattias Aström; Jean-Jacques Lemaire; Karin Wårdell
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Modeling of the human skull in EEG source analysis.

Authors:  Moritz Dannhauer; Benjamin Lanfer; Carsten H Wolters; Thomas R Knösche
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation.

Authors:  Seppo P Ahlfors; Jooman Han; John W Belliveau; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Patient-specific analysis of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Scott E Cooper; Jaimie M Henderson; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Cognitive function, P3a/P3b brain potentials, and cortical thickness in aging.

Authors:  Anders M Fjell; Kristine B Walhovd; Bruce Fischl; Ivar Reinvang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Segmentation of skull and scalp in 3-D human MRI using mathematical morphology.

Authors:  Belma Dogdas; David W Shattuck; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Is selective primary visual cortex stimulation achievable with TMS?

Authors:  Niina Salminen-Vaparanta; Valdas Noreika; Antti Revonsuo; Mika Koivisto; Simo Vanni
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Magnetic-resonance-based measurement of electromagnetic fields and conductivity in vivo using single current administration-A machine learning approach.

Authors:  Saurav Z K Sajib; Munish Chauhan; Oh In Kwon; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Influence of white matter anisotropic conductivity on EEG source localization: comparison to fMRI in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Zhongming Liu; Bryon A Mueller; Kelvin Lim; Bin He
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Brain-mind operational architectonics imaging: technical and methodological aspects.

Authors:  Andrew A Fingelkurts; Alexander A Fingelkurts
Journal:  Open Neuroimag J       Date:  2008-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.