Literature DB >> 29427847

Computationally optimized ECoG stimulation with local safety constraints.

Seyhmus Guler1, Moritz Dannhauer2, Biel Roig-Solvas3, Alexis Gkogkidis4, Rob Macleod2, Tonio Ball4, Jeffrey G Ojemann5, Dana H Brooks6.   

Abstract

Direct stimulation of the cortical surface is used clinically for cortical mapping and modulation of local activity. Future applications of cortical modulation and brain-computer interfaces may also use cortical stimulation methods. One common method to deliver current is through electrocorticography (ECoG) stimulation in which a dense array of electrodes are placed subdurally or epidurally to stimulate the cortex. However, proximity to cortical tissue limits the amount of current that can be delivered safely. It may be desirable to deliver higher current to a specific local region of interest (ROI) while limiting current to other local areas more stringently than is guaranteed by global safety limits. Two commonly used global safety constraints bound the total injected current and individual electrode currents. However, these two sets of constraints may not be sufficient to prevent high current density locally (hot-spots). In this work, we propose an efficient approach that prevents current density hot-spots in the entire brain while optimizing ECoG stimulus patterns for targeted stimulation. Specifically, we maximize the current along a particular desired directional field in the ROI while respecting three safety constraints: one on the total injected current, one on individual electrode currents, and the third on the local current density magnitude in the brain. This third set of constraints creates a computational barrier due to the huge number of constraints needed to bound the current density at every point in the entire brain. We overcome this barrier by adopting an efficient two-step approach. In the first step, the proposed method identifies the safe brain region, which cannot contain any hot-spots solely based on the global bounds on total injected current and individual electrode currents. In the second step, the proposed algorithm iteratively adjusts the stimulus pattern to arrive at a solution that exhibits no hot-spots in the remaining brain. We report on simulations on a realistic finite element (FE) head model with five anatomical ROIs and two desired directional fields. We also report on the effect of ROI depth and desired directional field on the focality of the stimulation. Finally, we provide an analysis of optimization runtime as a function of different safety and modeling parameters. Our results suggest that optimized stimulus patterns tend to differ from those used in clinical practice.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECoG; Electrocorticography stimulation; Local safety constraints; Optimization; Optimized; Safety

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29427847      PMCID: PMC5911187          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  45 in total

1.  The concept of the epileptogenic zone: a modern look at Penfield and Jasper's views on the role of interictal spikes.

Authors:  Andre Palmini
Journal:  Epileptic Disord       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.819

2.  Validation of finite element model of transcranial electrical stimulation using scalp potentials: implications for clinical dose.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Xiang Zhou; Yuzhou Su; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Optimization of focality and direction in dense electrode array transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Seyhmus Guler; Moritz Dannhauer; Burak Erem; Rob Macleod; Don Tucker; Sergei Turovets; Phan Luu; Deniz Erdogmus; Dana H Brooks
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Electrochemical considerations for safe electrical stimulation of the nervous system with platinum electrodes.

Authors:  S B Brummer; M J Turner
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study.

Authors:  Tim Wagner; Felipe Fregni; Shirley Fecteau; Alan Grodzinsky; Markus Zahn; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Intracerebral low frequency electrical stimulation: a new tool for the definition of the "epileptogenic area"?

Authors:  C Munari; P Kahane; L Tassi; S Francione; D Hoffmann; G Lo Russo; A L Benabid
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien)       Date:  1993

7.  Optimization of multifocal transcranial current stimulation for weighted cortical pattern targeting from realistic modeling of electric fields.

Authors:  Giulio Ruffini; Michael D Fox; Oscar Ripolles; Pedro Cavaleiro Miranda; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Pnina Grossman; Chris Thomas; Adantchede Louis Zannou; Jimmy Jiang; Tatheer Adnan; Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Greg Kronberg; Dennis Truong; Paulo Boggio; André R Brunoni; Leigh Charvet; Felipe Fregni; Brita Fritsch; Bernadette Gillick; Roy H Hamilton; Benjamin M Hampstead; Ryan Jankord; Adam Kirton; Helena Knotkova; David Liebetanz; Anli Liu; Colleen Loo; Michael A Nitsche; Janine Reis; Jessica D Richardson; Alexander Rotenberg; Peter E Turkeltaub; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  The influence of sulcus width on simulated electric fields induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  A M Janssen; S M Rampersad; F Lucka; B Lanfer; S Lew; U Aydin; C H Wolters; D F Stegeman; T F Oostendorp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Target optimization in transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Rosalind J Sadleir; Tracy D Vannorsdall; David J Schretlen; Barry Gordon
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.157

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Direct Electrical Stimulation in Electrocorticographic Brain-Computer Interfaces: Enabling Technologies for Input to Cortex.

Authors:  David J Caldwell; Jeffrey G Ojemann; Rajesh P N Rao
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.