Literature DB >> 24821532

Visualizing simulated electrical fields from electroencephalography and transcranial electric brain stimulation: a comparative evaluation.

Sebastian Eichelbaum1, Moritz Dannhauer2, Mario Hlawitschka3, Dana Brooks4, Thomas R Knösche5, Gerik Scheuermann6.   

Abstract

Electrical activity of neuronal populations is a crucial aspect of brain activity. This activity is not measured directly but recorded as electrical potential changes using head surface electrodes (electroencephalogram - EEG). Head surface electrodes can also be deployed to inject electrical currents in order to modulate brain activity (transcranial electric stimulation techniques) for therapeutic and neuroscientific purposes. In electroencephalography and noninvasive electric brain stimulation, electrical fields mediate between electrical signal sources and regions of interest (ROI). These fields can be very complicated in structure, and are influenced in a complex way by the conductivity profile of the human head. Visualization techniques play a central role to grasp the nature of those fields because such techniques allow for an effective conveyance of complex data and enable quick qualitative and quantitative assessments. The examination of volume conduction effects of particular head model parameterizations (e.g., skull thickness and layering), of brain anomalies (e.g., holes in the skull, tumors), location and extent of active brain areas (e.g., high concentrations of current densities) and around current injecting electrodes can be investigated using visualization. Here, we evaluate a number of widely used visualization techniques, based on either the potential distribution or on the current-flow. In particular, we focus on the extractability of quantitative and qualitative information from the obtained images, their effective integration of anatomical context information, and their interaction. We present illustrative examples from clinically and neuroscientifically relevant cases and discuss the pros and cons of the various visualization techniques.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioelectric Field; EEG; Human Brain; Visualization; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24821532      PMCID: PMC4172355          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  61 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Hybrid visualization for white matter tracts using triangle strips and point sprites.

Authors:  Dorit Merhof; Markus Sonntag; Frank Enders; Christopher Nimsky; Peter Hastreiter; Günther Greiner
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.579

4.  The current path in electric convulsion shock.

Authors:  K J HAYES
Journal:  Arch Neurol Psychiatry       Date:  1950-01

Review 5.  Therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation with direct currents (tDCS) in neuropsychiatric diseases.

Authors:  Min-Fang Kuo; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Volume conduction effects in EEG and MEG.

Authors:  S P van den Broek; F Reinders; M Donderwinkel; M J Peters
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-06

Review 7.  Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES - tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods.

Authors:  Walter Paulus
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.868

8.  Influence of anisotropic conductivity in the skull and white matter on transcranial direct current stimulation via an anatomically realistic finite element head model.

Authors:  Hyun Sang Suh; Won Hee Lee; Tae-Seong Kim
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature.

Authors:  S B Baumann; D R Wozny; S K Kelly; F M Meno
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric brain: a computational modeling study.

Authors:  Preet Minhas; Marom Bikson; Adam J Woods; Alyssa R Rosen; Sudha K Kessler
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2012
View more
  9 in total

1.  Impact of uncertain head tissue conductivity in the optimization of transcranial direct current stimulation for an auditory target.

Authors:  Christian Schmidt; Sven Wagner; Martin Burger; Ursula van Rienen; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Optimization of focality and direction in dense electrode array transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Seyhmus Guler; Moritz Dannhauer; Burak Erem; Rob Macleod; Don Tucker; Sergei Turovets; Phan Luu; Deniz Erdogmus; Dana H Brooks
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Forward and inverse effects of the complete electrode model in neonatal EEG.

Authors:  S Pursiainen; S Lew; C H Wolters
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Evaluation of Numerical Techniques for Solving the Current Injection Problem in Biological Tissues.

Authors:  Damon E Hyde; Moritz Dannhauer; Simon K Warfield; Rob MacLeod; Dana H Brooks
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2016-06-16

5.  Localizing movement-related primary sensorimotor cortices with multi-band EEG frequency changes and functional MRI.

Authors:  Ching-Chang Kuo; Phan Luu; Kyle K Morgan; Mark Dow; Colin Davey; Jasmine Song; Allen D Malony; Don M Tucker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Alternating Current Stimulation for Vision Restoration after Optic Nerve Damage: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Carolin Gall; Sein Schmidt; Michael P Schittkowski; Andrea Antal; Géza Gergely Ambrus; Walter Paulus; Moritz Dannhauer; Romualda Michalik; Alf Mante; Michal Bola; Anke Lux; Siegfried Kropf; Stephan A Brandt; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Decomposition of high-frequency electrical conductivity into extracellular and intracellular compartments based on two-compartment model using low-to-high multi-b diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Mun Bae Lee; Hyung Joong Kim; Oh In Kwon
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Age-related episodic memory decline and the role of amyloid-β: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jandirlly Julianna Souto; Gabriella Medeiros Silva; Natalia Leandro Almeida; Irina Ivanovna Shoshina; Natanael Antonio Santos; Thiago Paiva Fernandes
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep

9.  Improving Interference Control in ADHD Patients with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Carolin Breitling; Tino Zaehle; Moritz Dannhauer; Björn Bonath; Jana Tegelbeckers; Hans-Henning Flechtner; Kerstin Krauel
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 5.505

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.