Literature DB >> 22032945

Regional electric field induced by electroconvulsive therapy in a realistic finite element head model: influence of white matter anisotropic conductivity.

Won Hee Lee1, Zhi-De Deng, Tae-Seong Kim, Andrew F Laine, Sarah H Lisanby, Angel V Peterchev.   

Abstract

We present the first computational study investigating the electric field (E-field) strength generated by various electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) electrode configurations in specific brain regions of interest (ROIs) that have putative roles in the therapeutic action and/or adverse side effects of ECT. This study also characterizes the impact of the white matter (WM) conductivity anisotropy on the E-field distribution. A finite element head model incorporating tissue heterogeneity and WM anisotropic conductivity was constructed based on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion tensor MRI data. We computed the spatial E-field distributions generated by three standard ECT electrode placements including bilateral (BL), bifrontal (BF), and right unilateral (RUL) and an investigational electrode configuration for focal electrically administered seizure therapy (FEAST). The key results are that (1) the median E-field strength over the whole brain is 3.9, 1.5, 2.3, and 2.6 V/cm for the BL, BF, RUL, and FEAST electrode configurations, respectively, which coupled with the broad spread of the BL E-field suggests a biophysical basis for observations of superior efficacy of BL ECT compared to BF and RUL ECT; (2) in the hippocampi, BL ECT produces a median E-field of 4.8 V/cm that is 1.5-2.8 times stronger than that for the other electrode configurations, consistent with the more pronounced amnestic effects of BL ECT; and (3) neglecting the WM conductivity anisotropy results in E-field strength error up to 18% overall and up to 39% in specific ROIs, motivating the inclusion of the WM conductivity anisotropy in accurate head models. This computational study demonstrates how the realistic finite element head model incorporating tissue conductivity anisotropy provides quantitative insight into the biophysics of ECT, which may shed light on the differential clinical outcomes seen with various forms of ECT, and may guide the development of novel stimulation paradigms with improved risk/benefit ratio.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22032945      PMCID: PMC3495594          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  113 in total

1.  The effects of electroconvulsive therapy on memory of autobiographical and public events.

Authors:  S H Lisanby; J H Maddox; J Prudic; D P Devanand; H A Sackeim
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2000-06

Review 2.  Thalamic relay functions and their role in corticocortical communication: generalizations from the visual system.

Authors:  R W Guillery; S Murray Sherman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Influence of white matter conductivity anisotropy on electric field strength induced by electroconvulsive therapy.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Zhi-De Deng; Andrew F Laine; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

4.  Modeling skull electrical properties.

Authors:  R J Sadleir; A Argibay
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model.

Authors:  Rosalind J Sadleir; Tracy D Vannorsdall; David J Schretlen; Barry Gordon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Neuropsychological impact of Cg25 deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: preliminary results over 12 months.

Authors:  Heather E McNeely; Helen S Mayberg; Andres M Lozano; Sidney H Kennedy
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.254

7.  Guidelines for precise and accurate computational models of tDCS.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Abhishek Datta
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Modeling the excitation of fibers under surface electrodes.

Authors:  F Rattay
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bilateral and right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy at different stimulus intensities.

Authors:  H A Sackeim; J Prudic; D P Devanand; M S Nobler; S H Lisanby; S Peyser; L Fitzsimons; B J Moody; J Clark
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2000-05

10.  Diencephalic stimulation and the effects of ECT in endogenous depression.

Authors:  R Abrams; M A Taylor
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 9.319

View more
  31 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of frontal cortex decreases performance on the WAIS-IV intelligence test.

Authors:  Kristin K Sellers; Juliann M Mellin; Caroline M Lustenberger; Michael R Boyle; Won Hee Lee; Angel V Peterchev; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Neurocognitive Effects of Combined Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) and Venlafaxine in Geriatric Depression: Phase 1 of the PRIDE Study.

Authors:  Sarah H Lisanby; Shawn M McClintock; George Alexopoulos; Samuel H Bailine; Elisabeth Bernhardt; Mimi C Briggs; C Munro Cullum; Zhi-De Deng; Mary Dooley; Emma T Geduldig; Robert M Greenberg; Mustafa M Husain; Styliani Kaliora; Rebecca G Knapp; Vassilios Latoussakis; Lauren S Liebman; William V McCall; Martina Mueller; Georgios Petrides; Joan Prudic; Peter B Rosenquist; Matthew V Rudorfer; Shirlene Sampson; Abeba A Teklehaimanot; Kristen G Tobias; Richard D Weiner; Robert C Young; Charles H Kellner
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 3.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

4.  Grey matter volume increase following electroconvulsive therapy in patients with late life depression: a longitudinal MRI study.

Authors:  Filip Bouckaert; François-Laurent De Winter; Louise Emsell; Annemieke Dols; Didi Rhebergen; Martien Wampers; Stefan Sunaert; Max Stek; Pascal Sienaert; Mathieu Vandenbulcke
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.186

5.  Individualized Low-Amplitude Seizure Therapy: Minimizing Current for Electroconvulsive Therapy and Magnetic Seizure Therapy.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Andrew D Krystal; Moacyr A Rosa; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Analyzing the tradeoff between electrical complexity and accuracy in patient-specific computational models of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Minimum Electric Field Exposure for Seizure Induction with Electroconvulsive Therapy and Magnetic Seizure Therapy.

Authors:  Won H Lee; Sarah H Lisanby; Andrew F Laine; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Electric Field Model of Transcranial Electric Stimulation in Nonhuman Primates: Correspondence to Individual Motor Threshold.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Sarah H Lisanby; Andrew F Laine; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Effect of anatomical variability on electric field characteristics of electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy: a parametric modeling study.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Controlling stimulation strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy via current amplitude and electrode size and spacing: comparison with magnetic seizure therapy.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.