Literature DB >> 20058981

Temporal pitch percepts elicited by dual-channel stimulation of a cochlear implant.

Olivier Macherey1, Robert P Carlyon.   

Abstract

McKay and McDermott [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 1081-1092 (1996)] found that when two different amplitude-modulated pulse trains are presented to two channels separated by <1.5 mm, some cochlear implant (CI) listeners perceive the aggregate temporal pattern. The present study attempted to extend this general finding and to test whether dual-electrode stimulation would increase the upper limit of temporal pitch perception in CIs. Six subjects were asked to rank 12 dual-channel stimuli differing in their rate [ranging from 92 to 516 pps (pulses per second) on each individual channel] and in their inter-channel delay (pulses on the two channels being either nearly simultaneous or delayed by half the period). The data showed that, for an electrode separation of 0.75 or 1.1 mm, (a) the perceived pitch was on average slightly higher for the long-delay than for the short-delay stimuli but never matched the pitch corresponding to the aggregate temporal pattern, (b) the upper limit of temporal pitch did not increase using long-delay stimuli, and (c) the pitch differences between short- and long-delay stimuli were largely insensitive to channel order and to electrode configuration. These results suggest that there may be more independence between CI channels than previously thought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20058981      PMCID: PMC3000475          DOI: 10.1121/1.3269042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  The perceptual effects of current pulse duration in electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  C M McKay; H J McDermott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of cochlear-implant pulse rate and inter-channel timing on channel interactions and thresholds.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L).

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Heather A Kreft; Leonid Litvak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Optimizing the clinical fit of auditory brain stem implants.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Ian Nimmo-Smith; David M Baguley; Martin O'Driscoll; Richard Ramsden; Steven R Otto; Patrick R Axon; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Limitations on rate discrimination.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; John C Middlebrooks; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Limits of temporal pitch in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; John M Deeks; Patrick R Axon; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The perception of temporal patterns for electrical stimulation presented at one or two intracochlear sites.

Authors:  C M McKay; H J McDermott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  J E Rose; J F Brugge; D J Anderson; J E Hind
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  12 in total

1.  Binaural unmasking of multi-channel stimuli in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lieselot Van Deun; Astrid van Wieringen; Tom Francart; Andreas Büchner; Thomas Lenarz; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-09

2.  Discrimination between sequential and simultaneous virtual channels with electrical hearing.

Authors:  David Landsberger; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Rate and onset cues can improve cochlear implant synthetic vowel recognition in noise.

Authors:  Myles Mc Laughlin; Richard B Reilly; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Is there a fundamental 300 Hz limit to pulse rate discrimination in cochlear implants?

Authors:  Pieter J Venter; Johan J Hanekom
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-19

5.  Place-pitch manipulations with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; John M Deeks; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-30

7.  Judgment of musical emotions after cochlear implantation in adults with progressive deafness.

Authors:  Emmanuèle Ambert-Dahan; Anne-Lise Giraud; Olivier Sterkers; Séverine Samson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-12

8.  Pitch Matching in Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness: Effects of Electrode Position and Acoustic Stimulus Type.

Authors:  Youssef Adel; Sharon Nagel; Tobias Weissgerber; Uwe Baumann; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Using Interleaved Stimulation to Measure the Size and Selectivity of the Sustained Phase-Locked Neural Response to Cochlear Implant Stimulation.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; François Guérit; John M Deeks; Andrew Harland; Robin Gransier; Jan Wouters; Simone R de Rijk; Manohar Bance
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-25

10.  Auditory Stream Segregation and Selective Attention for Cochlear Implant Listeners: Evidence From Behavioral Measures and Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Andreu Paredes-Gallardo; Hamish Innes-Brown; Sara M K Madsen; Torsten Dau; Jeremy Marozeau
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.