Literature DB >> 33492562

Using Interleaved Stimulation to Measure the Size and Selectivity of the Sustained Phase-Locked Neural Response to Cochlear Implant Stimulation.

Robert P Carlyon1, François Guérit2, John M Deeks2, Andrew Harland2, Robin Gransier3, Jan Wouters3, Simone R de Rijk4, Manohar Bance4.   

Abstract

We measured the sustained neural response to electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant (CI). To do so, we interleaved two stimuli with frequencies F1 and F2 Hz and recorded a neural distortion response (NDR) at F2-F1 Hz. We show that, because any one time point contains only the F1 or F2 stimulus, the instantaneous nonlinearities typical of electrical artefact should not produce distortion at this frequency. However, if the stimulus is smoothed, such as by charge integration at the nerve membrane, subsequent (neural) nonlinearities can produce a component at F2-F1 Hz. We stimulated a single CI electrode with interleaved sinusoids or interleaved amplitude-modulated pulse trains such that F2 = 1.5F1, and found no evidence for an NDR when F2-F1 was between 90 and 120 Hz. However, interleaved amplitude-modulated pulse trains with F2-F1~40 Hz revealed a substantial NDR with a group delay of about 45 ms, consistent with a thalamic and/or cortical response. The NDR could be measured even from recording electrodes adjacent to the implant and at the highest pulse rates (> 4000 pps) used clinically. We then measured the selectivity of this sustained response by presenting F1 and F2 to different electrodes and at different between-electrode distances. This revealed a broad tuning that, we argue, reflects the overlap between the excitation elicited by the two electrodes. Our results also provide a glimpse of the neural nonlinearity in the auditory system, unaffected by the biomechanical cochlear nonlinearities that accompany acoustic stimulation. Several potential clinical applications of our findings are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implants; cortical response; electrophysiology; neural nonlinearity; psychophysics

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33492562      PMCID: PMC7943679          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-020-00783-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  62 in total

Review 1.  Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jason Boulet; Mark White; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

2.  Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system.

Authors:  D Cafarelli Dees; N Dillier; W K Lai; E von Wallenberg; B van Dijk; F Akdas; M Aksit; C Batman; A Beynon; S Burdo; J-M Chanal; L Collet; M Conway; C Coudert; L Craddock; H Cullington; N Deggouj; B Fraysse; S Grabel; J Kiefer; J G Kiss; T Lenarz; A Mair; S Maune; J Müller-Deile; J-P Piron; S Razza; C Tasche; H Thai-Van; F Toth; E Truy; A Uziel; G F Smoorenburg
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 3.  A different approach to using neural response telemetry for automated cochlear implant processor programming.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Leonie Fewster; Pam Dawson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Spatial selectivity to intracochlear electrical stimulation in the inferior colliculus is degraded after long-term deafness in cats.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer; Ralph E Beitel; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The perception of temporal patterns for electrical stimulation presented at one or two intracochlear sites.

Authors:  C M McKay; H J McDermott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effect of Pulse Polarity on Thresholds and on Non-monotonic Loudness Growth in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Robert P Carlyon; Jacques Chatron; Stéphane Roman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-30

7.  Objective measures of electrode discrimination with electrically evoked auditory change complex and speech-perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Shuman He; John H Grose; Holly F B Teagle; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 8.  Cochlear implants and brain plasticity.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Dexter R F Irvine; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Detection of Extracochlear Electrodes in Cochlear Implants with Electric Field Imaging/Transimpedance Measurements: A Human Cadaver Study.

Authors:  Simone R de Rijk; Yu C Tam; Robert P Carlyon; Manohar L Bance
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Differences between psychoacoustic and frequency following response measures of distortion tone level and masking.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Redwan Farooq; Louwai Muhammed; Christopher J Plack; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Tobias Goehring
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.