Literature DB >> 20033248

The dependence of auditory nerve rate adaptation on electric stimulus parameters, electrode position, and fiber diameter: a computer model study.

Jihwan Woo1, Charles A Miller, Paul J Abbas.   

Abstract

This paper describes results from a stochastic computational neuron model that simulates the effects of rate adaptation on the responses to electrical stimulation in the form of pulse trains. We recently reported results from a single-node computational model that included a novel element that tracks external potassium ion concentration so as to modify membrane voltage and cause adaptation-like responses. Here, we report on an improved version of the model that incorporates the anatomical components of a complete feline auditory nerve fiber (ANF) so that conduction velocity and effects of manipulating the site of excitation can be evaluated. Model results demonstrate rate adaptation and changes in spike amplitude similar to those reported for feline ANFs. Changing the site of excitation from a central to a peripheral axonal site resulted in plausible changes in latency and relative spread (i.e., dynamic range). Also, increasing the distance between a modeled ANF and a stimulus electrode tended to decrease the degree of rate adaptation observed in pulse-train responses. This effect was clearly observed for high-rate (5,000 pulse/s) trains but not low-rate (250 pulse/s) trains. Finally, for relatively short electrode-to-ANF distances, increases in modeled ANF diameter increased the degree of rate adaptation. These results are compared against available feline ANF data, and possible effects of individual parameters are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20033248      PMCID: PMC2862915          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-009-0199-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  63 in total

1.  Physiologic identification of eighth nerve subdivisions: direct recordings with bipolar and monopolar electrodes.

Authors:  B H Nguyen; E Javel; S C Levine
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1999-07

2.  Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Kirill V Nourski; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation I: comparison of scala tympani and intrameatal electrode responses.

Authors:  Lianne A Cartee; Charles A Miller; Chris van den Honert
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The diameters of guinea pig auditory nerve fibres: distribution and correlation with spontaneous rate.

Authors:  O Gleich; S Wilson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein; B S Wilson; C C Finley; P J Abbas
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Stochastic versions of the Hodgkin-Huxley equations.

Authors:  R F Fox
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  The site at which peripheral auditory adaptation occurs.

Authors:  C H Norris; P S Guth; E A Daigneault
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-03-04       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Morphometry of intracellularly labeled neurons of the auditory nerve: correlations with functional properties.

Authors:  M C Liberman; M E Oliver
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1984-02-20       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  The cochlear nerve in the cat: topography, cochleotopy, and fiber spectrum.

Authors:  A R Arnesen; K K Osen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1978-04-15       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Sodium currents and sodium-current fluctuations in rat myelinated nerve fibres.

Authors:  B Neumcke; R Stämpfli
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  17 in total

1.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Neural masking by sub-threshold electric stimuli: animal and computer model results.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Jihwan Woo; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-16

Review 3.  Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jason Boulet; Mark White; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

4.  Comparison of spinal cord stimulation profiles from intra- and extradural electrode arrangements by finite element modelling.

Authors:  Qiujun Huang; Hiroyuki Oya; Oliver E Flouty; Chandan G Reddy; Matthew A Howard; George T Gillies; Marcel Utz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Predictions of the Contribution of HCN Half-Maximal Activation Potential Heterogeneity to Variability in Intrinsic Adaptation of Spiral Ganglion Neurons.

Authors:  Jason Boulet; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-09

6.  Effect of Pulse Rate on Loudness Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Mahan Azadpour; Colette M McKay; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-12

7.  Stochastic differential equation models for ion channel noise in Hodgkin-Huxley neurons.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Nikita S Imennov; Michael Famulare; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2011-04-11

8.  Temporal response properties of the auditory nerve: data from human cochlear-implant recipients.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Erin E Castioni; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Biomimetic encoding model for restoring touch in bionic hands through a nerve interface.

Authors:  Elizaveta V Okorokova; Qinpu He; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 10.  The what and where of adding channel noise to the Hodgkin-Huxley equations.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.