Literature DB >> 10431897

Physiologic identification of eighth nerve subdivisions: direct recordings with bipolar and monopolar electrodes.

B H Nguyen1, E Javel, S C Levine.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine stimulation and recording parameters that maximize differences in evoked responses recorded between the cochlear nerve and the surrounding tissues. Click-evoked potentials were obtained using monopolar and bipolar recording electrodes placed directly on the exposed eighth nerve of anesthetized cats. Responses were compared as stimulus intensity, electrode location, and bipolar electrode orientation and interelectrode spacing were systematically varied. Wave amplitudes increased monotonically with intensity for both monopolar and bipolar configurations, but bipolar configurations exhibited greater selectivity in differentiating cochlear from vestibular subdivisions. The optimal stimulus intensity was 70 to 80 dB peak sound pressure level (pSPL). Monopolar recordings were often confounded by activity originating at remote sites, typically the cochlear nucleus and (for recording sites on the vestibular nerve) the cochlear nerve. Bipolar response amplitudes increased with interelectrode spacing and were largest when electrodes were oriented parallel to the long axis of the nerve. Extrapolation of empirical data indicated that amplitudes of bipolar responses would be maximal at an electrode separation of 7.5 mm. Cochlear nerve conduction velocity, calculated from wave latencies at each of the two monopolar electrodes, was 11.6 +/- 1.6 m/sec.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10431897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  4 in total

1.  The dependence of auditory nerve rate adaptation on electric stimulus parameters, electrode position, and fiber diameter: a computer model study.

Authors:  Jihwan Woo; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

2.  Noise Masking in Cochlear Synaptopathy: Auditory Brainstem Response vs. Auditory Nerve Response in Mouse.

Authors:  Kirupa Suthakar; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.974

Review 3.  Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring : A Review of Techniques Used for Brain Tumor Surgery in Children.

Authors:  Keewon Kim; Charles Cho; Moon-Suk Bang; Hyung-Ik Shin; Ji-Hoon Phi; Seung-Ki Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2018-05-01

4.  Spike-Conducting Integrate-and-Fire Model.

Authors:  Go Ashida; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-09-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.