Literature DB >> 7403879

Estimating cancer risks from low doses of ionizing radiation.

C E Land.   

Abstract

Disagreements about the somatic risks from low doses of ionizing radiation stem from two difficulties fundamental to the logic of inference from observational data. First, precise direct estimation of small risks requires impracticably large samples. Second, precise estimates of low-dose risks based largely on high-dose data, for which the sample size requirements are more easily satisfied, must depend heavily on assumptions about the shape of the dose-response curve, even when only a few of the parameters of the theoretical form of the curve are unknown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7403879     DOI: 10.1126/science.7403879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  53 in total

Review 1.  CT colonography: perforation rates and potential radiation risks.

Authors:  A Berrington de Gonzalez; Kwang Pyo Kim; Judy Yee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2010-04

2.  The statistical power of epidemiological studies analyzing the relationship between exposure to ionizing radiation and cancer, with special reference to childhood leukemia and natural background radiation.

Authors:  M P Little; R Wakeford; J H Lubin; G M Kendall
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Levels of naturally occurring gamma radiation measured in British homes and their prediction in particular residences.

Authors:  G M Kendall; R Wakeford; M Athanson; T J Vincent; E J Carter; N P McColl; M P Little
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Radiation-related cancer risks from CT colonography screening: a risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Kwang Pyo Kim; Amy B Knudsen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Carolyn M Rutter; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Judy Yee; Karen M Kuntz; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber; Christine D Berg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Myocardial perfusion scans: projected population cancer risks from current levels of use in the United States.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Dorothea McAreavey
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Atomic bomb health benefits.

Authors:  T D Luckey
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Richard Wakeford; E Janet Tawn; Simon D Bouffler; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Ultrasound-detected thyroid nodule prevalence and radiation dose from fallout.

Authors:  C E Land; Z Zhumadilov; B I Gusev; M H Hartshorne; P W Wiest; P W Woodward; L A Crooks; N K Luckyanov; C M Fillmore; Z Carr; G Abisheva; H L Beck; A Bouville; J Langer; R Weinstock; K I Gordeev; S Shinkarev; S L Simon
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Mammography in screening for breast cancer: a viewpoint.

Authors:  M Dworkind; S Greenberg
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca Lewis; Fred Mettler; Charles Land
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.