Michael E Arch1, Donald P Frush. 1. Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, 1905 McGovern-Davison Children's Health Center, Box 3808 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA. mearch@juno.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how pediatric body MDCT scanning parameters (i.e., the principal determinants of radiation dose) have changed since a prior survey conducted in 2001. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey used in this study consisted of 27 questions addressing practice setting; equipment; and scanning parameters including kilovoltage, tube current, and pitch. Members of the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) received an email with a link to the Web-based survey. Respondents were asked to complete only one survey to represent their practice and indicate the number of pediatric radiologists their response represented. RESULTS: Sixty-one responses representing 337 pediatric radiologists were received. Eighty-four percent of respondents practice in a university or children's hospital. No respondents reported using a peak kilovoltage setting of higher than 120 kVp for routine chest or abdomen scans. Those using 110 kVp or less increased from 4% to 48% for chest CT and from 1% to 32% for abdominal CT (p < 0.001). Weight-based adjustments in tube current are used by 98% of respondents. Tube current tends to increase with a patient's age or weight, with most pediatric body imaging examinations being performed with a tube current of less than 150 mA. The mean tube current used across all age groups decreased between 31 and 61 mA (p < 0.001), with the largest percentage decreases in patients in the 0-4 years age group. CONCLUSION: Since 2001, the peak kilovoltage and tube current settings, two principal parameters determining radiation dose, used by SPR members have decreased significantly for pediatric body MDCT. It is a reasonable assumption that these changes are due to efforts to increase awareness about the risks of radiation.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how pediatric body MDCT scanning parameters (i.e., the principal determinants of radiation dose) have changed since a prior survey conducted in 2001. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey used in this study consisted of 27 questions addressing practice setting; equipment; and scanning parameters including kilovoltage, tube current, and pitch. Members of the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) received an email with a link to the Web-based survey. Respondents were asked to complete only one survey to represent their practice and indicate the number of pediatric radiologists their response represented. RESULTS: Sixty-one responses representing 337 pediatric radiologists were received. Eighty-four percent of respondents practice in a university or children's hospital. No respondents reported using a peak kilovoltage setting of higher than 120 kVp for routine chest or abdomen scans. Those using 110 kVp or less increased from 4% to 48% for chest CT and from 1% to 32% for abdominal CT (p < 0.001). Weight-based adjustments in tube current are used by 98% of respondents. Tube current tends to increase with a patient's age or weight, with most pediatric body imaging examinations being performed with a tube current of less than 150 mA. The mean tube current used across all age groups decreased between 31 and 61 mA (p < 0.001), with the largest percentage decreases in patients in the 0-4 years age group. CONCLUSION: Since 2001, the peak kilovoltage and tube current settings, two principal parameters determining radiation dose, used by SPR members have decreased significantly for pediatric body MDCT. It is a reasonable assumption that these changes are due to efforts to increase awareness about the risks of radiation.
Authors: Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: Imaging Med Date: 2009-10
Authors: Michael F Brinkley; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Ehsan Samei; Daniel J Frush; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Joshua M Wilson; Olav I Christianson; Donald P Frush Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Xiang Li; Ehsan Samei; W Paul Segars; Gregory M Sturgeon; James G Colsher; Donald P Frush Journal: Med Phys Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Amy Berrington de González; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca Lewis; Fred Mettler; Charles Land Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-12-14