Literature DB >> 22071014

Elevated levels of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein breakdown products in mild and moderate traumatic brain injury are associated with intracranial lesions and neurosurgical intervention.

Linda Papa1, Lawrence M Lewis, Jay L Falk, Zhiqun Zhang, Salvatore Silvestri, Philip Giordano, Gretchen M Brophy, Jason A Demery, Neha K Dixit, Ian Ferguson, Ming Cheng Liu, Jixiang Mo, Linnet Akinyi, Kara Schmid, Stefania Mondello, Claudia S Robertson, Frank C Tortella, Ronald L Hayes, Kevin K W Wang.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: This study examines whether serum levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein breakdown products (GFAP-BDP) are elevated in patients with mild and moderate traumatic brain injury compared with controls and whether they are associated with traumatic intracranial lesions on computed tomography (CT) scan (positive CT result) and with having a neurosurgical intervention.
METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled adult patients presenting to 3 Level I trauma centers after blunt head trauma with loss of consciousness, amnesia, or disorientation and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 9 to 15. Control groups included normal uninjured controls and trauma controls presenting to the emergency department with orthopedic injuries or a motor vehicle crash without traumatic brain injury. Blood samples were obtained in all patients within 4 hours of injury and measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for GFAP-BDP (nanograms/milliliter).
RESULTS: Of the 307 patients enrolled, 108 were patients with traumatic brain injury (97 with GCS score 13 to 15 and 11 with GCS score 9 to 12) and 199 were controls (176 normal controls and 16 motor vehicle crash controls and 7 orthopedic controls). Receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated that early GFAP-BDP levels were able to distinguish patients with traumatic brain injury from uninjured controls with an area under the curve of 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86 to 0.94) and differentiated traumatic brain injury with a GCS score of 15 with an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.93). Thirty-two patients with traumatic brain injury (30%) had lesions on CT. The area under these curves for discriminating patients with CT lesions versus those without CT lesions was 0.79 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.89). Moreover, the receiver operating characteristic curve for distinguishing neurosurgical intervention from no neurosurgical intervention yielded an area under the curve of 0.87 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.96).
CONCLUSION: GFAP-BDP is detectable in serum within an hour of injury and is associated with measures of injury severity, including the GCS score, CT lesions, and neurosurgical intervention. Further study is required to validate these findings before clinical application.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22071014      PMCID: PMC3830977          DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  62 in total

1.  GFAP and S100B are biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  P E Vos; B Jacobs; T M J C Andriessen; K J B Lamers; G F Borm; T Beems; M Edwards; C F Rosmalen; J L M Vissers
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Return to play guidelines after a head injury.

Authors:  R C Cantu
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.182

4.  Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria in patients with minor head injury.

Authors:  Ian G Stiell; Catherine M Clement; Brian H Rowe; Michael J Schull; Robert Brison; Daniel Cass; Mary A Eisenhauer; R Douglas McKnight; Glen Bandiera; Brian Holroyd; Jacques S Lee; Jonathan Dreyer; James R Worthington; Mark Reardon; Gary Greenberg; Howard Lesiuk; Iain MacPhail; George A Wells
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Proteomic identification of biomarkers of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Kevin K W Wang; Andrew K Ottens; Ming Cheng Liu; Stephen B Lewis; Colleen Meegan; Monika W Oli; Frank C Tortella; Ronald L Hayes
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.940

6.  Traumatic brain damage: serum S-100 protein measurements related to neuroradiological findings.

Authors:  B Romner; T Ingebrigtsen; P Kongstad; S E Børgesen
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Comparison of serial S-100 and NSE serum measurements after severe head injury.

Authors:  C Woertgen; R D Rothoerl; M Holzschuh; C Metz; A Brawanski
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  GFAP versus S100B in serum after traumatic brain injury: relationship to brain damage and outcome.

Authors:  Linda E Pelinka; Alfred Kroepfl; Martin Leixnering; Walter Buchinger; Andreas Raabe; Heinz Redl
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Increased serum-GFAP in patients with severe traumatic brain injury is related to outcome.

Authors:  K Nylén; M Ost; L Z Csajbok; I Nilsson; K Blennow; B Nellgård; L Rosengren
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 3.181

10.  The use of CT scanning to triage patients requiring admission following minimal head injury.

Authors:  D H Livingston; P A Loder; J Koziol; C D Hunt
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1991-04
View more
  106 in total

1.  Identification of autoantibodies to glial fibrillary acidic protein in spinal cord injury patients.

Authors:  Georgene W Hergenroeder; Anthony N Moore; Karl M Schmitt; John B Redell; Pramod K Dash
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Circulating Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Has Diagnostic and Prognostic Value in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Frederick K Korley; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Alan H B Wu; John K Yue; Geoffrey T Manley; Haris I Sair; Jennifer Van Eyk; Allen D Everett; David O Okonkwo; Alex B Valadka; Wayne A Gordon; Andrew I R Maas; Pratik Mukherjee; Esther L Yuh; Hester F Lingsma; Ava M Puccio; David M Schnyer
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Phage display for identification of serum biomarkers of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Sarbani Ghoshal; Vimala Bondada; Kathryn E Saatman; Rodney P Guttmann; James W Geddes
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 4.  Current status of fluid biomarkers in mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Kulbe; James W Geddes
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 5.330

5.  Raising the Bar for Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarker Research: Methods Make a Difference.

Authors:  Linda Papa; Kevin K W Wang
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Neuronal Enriched Extracellular Vesicle Proteins as Biomarkers for Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Hanuma Kumar Karnati; Joseph H Garcia; David Tweedie; Robert E Becker; Dimitrios Kapogiannis; Nigel H Greig
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Protein biomarkers for traumatic and ischemic brain injury: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Zhiqun Zhang; Stefania Mondello; Firas Kobeissy; Richard Rubenstein; Jackson Streeter; Ronald L Hayes; Kevin K W Wang
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.829

8.  Mild Traumatic Brain Injury among the Geriatric Population.

Authors:  Linda Papa; Matthew E Mendes; Carolina F Braga
Journal:  Curr Transl Geriatr Exp Gerontol Rep       Date:  2012-09-01

9.  Diagnosis of traumatic brain injury using miRNA signatures in nanomagnetically isolated brain-derived extracellular vesicles.

Authors:  J Ko; M Hemphill; Z Yang; E Sewell; Y J Na; D K Sandsmark; M Haber; S A Fisher; E A Torre; K C Svane; A Omelchenko; B L Firestein; R Diaz-Arrastia; J Kim; D F Meaney; D Issadore
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.799

10.  GFAP-BDP as an acute diagnostic marker in traumatic brain injury: results from the prospective transforming research and clinical knowledge in traumatic brain injury study.

Authors:  David O Okonkwo; John K Yue; Ava M Puccio; David M Panczykowski; Tomoo Inoue; Paul J McMahon; Marco D Sorani; Esther L Yuh; Hester F Lingsma; Andrew I R Maas; Alex B Valadka; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.