Literature DB >> 17038410

16-slice CT: achievable effective doses of common protocols in comparison with recent CT dose surveys.

A J Van der Molen1, W J H Veldkamp, J Geleijns.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate achievable dose levels in 16-slice CT by evaluating CT dose indices (CTDI) and effective doses of dose-optimized protocols compared with 4-slice dose surveys. Normalized CTDI free in air and in 16 cm and 32 cm diameter phantoms were measured on four different 16-slice CT scanners in the Netherlands. All collimation and tube potential settings were analysed. Volume CTDI was calculated for adult protocols for brain, chest, pulmonary angiography (CTPA), abdomen and biphasic liver CT. Effective doses were calculated first using volume CTDI with conversion factors and second from CTDIair values using the ImPACT dose calculator. Average results of the 16-slice scanners were correlated to results of dose surveys with predominantly 4-slice scanners. Statistical analysis was done with Student t-tests with a Bonferroni correction; therefore p < 0.017 was significant. The results of CTDIair and weighted CTDI were documented for all scanners. Effective doses averaged over four scanners for brain, chest, CTPA, abdomen and biphasic liver protocols were 1.9+/-0.4, 3.8+/-0.4, 3.0+/-0.2, 7.2+/-0.9 and 10.2+/-1.3 mSv, respectively. Compared with dose surveys achievable effective doses were equal (p = 0.069) to significantly lower (p < 0.017) for chest and abdomen protocols. For 16-slice spiral brain CT there was a trend of equal doses compared with sequential brain CT in the dose surveys. Thus, with dose-optimized protocols 16-slice CT can achieve equal to lower effective doses in examinations of the chest and abdomen compared with 4-slice CT, while doses can remain stable in the brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17038410     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/52356535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  12 in total

1.  Angiographic CT after intravenous contrast agent application: A noninvasive follow-up tool after intracranial angioplasty and stenting.

Authors:  M-N Psychogios; P Schramm; J-H Buhk; A Xyda; K Gröschel; K Jung; M Knauth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Feasibility of flat panel angiographic CT after intravenous contrast agent application in the postoperative evaluation of patients with clipped aneurysms.

Authors:  M-N Psychogios; D Wachter; A Mohr; P Schramm; A-M Frölich; K Jung; V Rohde; M Knauth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca Lewis; Fred Mettler; Charles Land
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

4.  Radiation dose evaluation in 64-slice CT examinations with adult and paediatric anthropomorphic phantoms.

Authors:  K Fujii; T Aoyama; C Yamauchi-Kawaura; S Koyama; M Yamauchi; S Ko; K Akahane; K Nishizawa
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Computed tomography dose assessment for a 160 mm wide, 320 detector row, cone beam CT scanner.

Authors:  J Geleijns; M Salvadó Artells; P W de Bruin; R Matter; Y Muramatsu; M F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  [Radiation dose in computed tomography. Risks and challenges].

Authors:  M Prokop
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Radiation exposure from CT examinations in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshito Tsushima; Ayako Taketomi-Takahashi; Hiroyuki Takei; Hidenori Otake; Keigo Endo
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 1.930

8.  Comparison of radiation doses using weight-based protocol and dose modulation techniques for patients undergoing biphasic abdominal computed tomography examinations.

Authors:  Roshan S Livingstone; Paul M Dinakaran; Rekha S Cherian; Anu Eapen
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2009-10

9.  Quantitative analysis of CT-perfusion parameters in the evaluation of brain gliomas and metastases.

Authors:  Anna Maria Di Nallo; Antonello Vidiri; Simona Marzi; Alessandra Mirri; Alessandra Fabi; Carmine Maria Carapella; Andrea Pace; Marcello Crecco
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-16

10.  Angiographic CT with intravenous administration of contrast medium is a noninvasive option for follow-up after intracranial stenting.

Authors:  Jan-Hendrik Buhk; Paul Lingor; Michael Knauth
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.