Literature DB >> 19955729

The Hybrid cochlear implant: a review.

Erika A Woodson, Lina A J Reiss, Christopher W Turner, Kate Gfeller, Bruce J Gantz.   

Abstract

The Hybrid S or 'short-electrode' cochlear implant was developed to treat patients with a severe to profound hearing loss limited to the high frequencies. The short electrode is implanted into just the base or high-frequency region of the cochlea, with the goal of preserving residual low-frequency hearing. As a result, electric stimulation can be combined with acoustic stimulation in the same ear (and the opposite ear); this is one instance of 'acoustic plus electric' (A + E) stimulation. In this paper, we will review the latest findings from the first two stages of the clinical trial for the Hybrid concept in the United States. Generally, we will review surgical techniques, clinical trial criteria, residual hearing preservation, improvements in speech perception in quiet, and predictive factors for patient benefit. We will also discuss the significant benefit of A + E stimulation for speech perception in noise and musical measures of melody and instrument recognition, as well as valuable insights into central auditory nervous system plasticity gained from the use of a very short electrode array. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19955729      PMCID: PMC4274269          DOI: 10.1159/000262604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0065-3071


  27 in total

1.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  S Rosen; A Faulkner; L Wilkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner; Bruce J Gantz; Corina Vidal; Amy Behrens; Belinda A Henry
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Hearing loss and the limits of amplification.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

5.  Combined electric and contralateral acoustic hearing: word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Sharon A McKarns; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Wolfgang Gstoettner; Jan Kiefer; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Stefan Pok; Silke Peters; Oliver Adunka
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  C A Hogan; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Christopher W Turner; Sheryl R Erenberg; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-03-09

10.  Simulations of tonotopically mapped speech processors for cochlear implant electrodes varying in insertion depth.

Authors:  Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen; Deborah Stanton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  34 in total

1.  The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Michael Seedorff; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  [Aspects of inner ear trauma in CI treatment].

Authors:  T Klenzner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  A systematic review of electric-acoustic stimulation: device fitting ranges, outcomes, and clinical fitting practices.

Authors:  Paola V Incerti; Teresa Y C Ching; Robert Cowan
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-03

4.  Systemic immunity influences hearing preservation in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Melanie Souter; Hayden Eastwood; Paul Marovic; Gordana Kel; Sarin Wongprasartsuk; Allen F Ryan; Stephen John O'Leary
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Scanning electrochemical microscopy as a novel proximity sensor for atraumatic cochlear implant insertion.

Authors:  H Watanabe; J Velmurugan; M V Mirkin; M A Svirsky; A K Lalwani; R R Llinas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Carolyn J Brown; Eun Kyung Jeon; Li-Kuei Chiou; Benjamin Kirby; Sue A Karsten; Christopher W Turner; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Insertion trauma of a cochlear implant electrode array with Nitinol inlay.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Lenka Harbach; Nick Pawsey; Marcel Kluge; Peter Erfurt; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Acoustic plus electric speech processing: Long-term results.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Camille C Dunn; Jacob Oleson; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Colin L W Driscoll; Peter Roland; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Speech audiometry and data logging in CI patients : Implications for adequate test levels.

Authors:  M Hey; T Hocke; P Ambrosch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.