Literature DB >> 17063003

Hearing loss and the limits of amplification.

Christopher W Turner1.   

Abstract

This review article summarizes the effects of sensorineural hearing loss on the recognition of amplified speech, both for speech presented in quiet and in a noise background. Some hypotheses are presented regarding the underlying damage in the cochlea that leads to the deficits in speech recognition for hearing losses of various configurations. For severe hearing losses in the high frequencies, amplification is often ineffective. While the existing data also suggest that sensorineural hearing loss can lead to poor frequency resolution, which leads to problems understanding speech in noise, the frequency resolution of the cochlear implant is usually even poorer. Therefore a strategy of preserving low-frequency residual hearing combined with electrical stimulation for the higher frequencies is an attractive solution for patients with severe high-frequency hearing loss. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17063003     DOI: 10.1159/000095606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  20 in total

1.  Utility and importance of hearing-aid features assessed by hearing-aid acousticians.

Authors:  Hartmut Meister; Linda Grugel; Martin Walger; Hasso von Wedel; Markus Meis
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-09

2.  Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.

Authors:  Jeong-Seo Kim; Viral D Tejani; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Combined acoustic and electric hearing: preserving residual acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner; Lina A J Reiss; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  L A J Reiss; C W Turner; S A Karsten; B J Gantz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Perceptual learning for speech in noise after application of binary time-frequency masks.

Authors:  Mahnaz Ahmadi; Vauna L Gross; Donal G Sinex
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Recognition of speech in noise after application of time-frequency masks: dependence on frequency and threshold parameters.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory complications in childhood cancer survivors: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study.

Authors:  Kimberly Whelan; Kayla Stratton; Toana Kawashima; Wendy Leisenring; Susan Hayashi; John Waterbor; Julie Blatt; Charles A Sklar; Roger Packer; Pauline Mitby; Leslie L Robison; Ann C Mertens
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 9.  The Hybrid cochlear implant: a review.

Authors:  Erika A Woodson; Lina A J Reiss; Christopher W Turner; Kate Gfeller; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

10.  Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients in speech reception in the presence of background music.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Christopher Turner; Jacob Oleson; Stephanie Kliethermes; Virginia Driscoll
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.