Literature DB >> 24845292

Scanning electrochemical microscopy as a novel proximity sensor for atraumatic cochlear implant insertion.

H Watanabe, J Velmurugan, M V Mirkin, M A Svirsky, A K Lalwani, R R Llinas.   

Abstract

A growing number of minimally invasive surgical and diagnostic procedures require the insertion of an optical, mechanical, or electronic device in narrow spaces inside a human body. In such procedures, precise motion control is essential to avoid damage to the patient's tissues and/or the device itself. A typical example is the insertion of a cochlear implant which should ideally be done with minimum physical contact between the moving device and the cochlear canal walls or the basilar membrane. Because optical monitoring is not possible, alternative techniques for sub millimeter-scale distance control can be very useful for such procedures. The first requirement for distance control is distance sensing. We developed a novel approach to distance sensing based on the principles of scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). The SECM signal, i.e., the diffusion current to a microelectrode, is very sensitive to the distance between the probe surface and any electrically insulating object present in its proximity. With several amperometric microprobes fabricated on the surface of an insertable device, one can monitor the distances between different parts of the moving implant and the surrounding tissues. Unlike typical SECM experiments, in which a disk-shaped tip approaches a relatively smooth sample, complex geometries of the mobile device and its surroundings make distance sensing challenging. Additional issues include the possibility of electrode surface contamination in biological fluids and the requirement for a biologically compatible redox mediator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24845292      PMCID: PMC4152238          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2308058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  40 in total

1.  Intensity-dependent changes in oxygenation of cochlear perilymph during acoustic exposure.

Authors:  F Scheibe; H Haupt; C Ludwig
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Brief, noninjurious electric waveform for stimulation of the brain.

Authors:  J C LILLY; J R HUGHES; E C ALVORD; T W GALKIN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1955-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Cochlear implant electrode array insertion monitoring with intra-operative 3D rotational X-ray.

Authors:  B Carelsen; W Grolman; R Tange; G J Streekstra; P van Kemenade; R J Jansen; N J M Freling; M White; B Maat; W J Fokkens
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.597

4.  Measurements of perilymphatic oxygen tension in guinea pigs exposed to loud sound.

Authors:  H Haupt; F Scheibe; C Ludwig; D Petzold
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Impact of the insertion speed of cochlear implant electrodes on the insertion forces.

Authors:  Georgios Kontorinis; Thomas Lenarz; Timo Stöver; Gerrit Paasche
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Calculations of the pH changes produced in body tissue by a spherical stimulation electrode.

Authors:  C L Ballestrasse; R T Ruggeri; T R Beck
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Flexible cochlear microendoscopy in the gerbil.

Authors:  Adam P Campbell; Thomas A Suberman; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 8.  The Hybrid cochlear implant: a review.

Authors:  Erika A Woodson; Lina A J Reiss; Christopher W Turner; Kate Gfeller; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

9.  Real-time measurement of electrode impedance during intracochlear electrode insertion.

Authors:  Chin-Tuan Tan; Mario Svirsky; Abbas Anwar; Shaun Kumar; Bernie Caessens; Paul Carter; Claudiu Treaba; J Thomas Roland
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Fluoroscopically assisted cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Andrew J Fishman; J Thomas Roland; George Alexiades; Jozef Mierzwinski; Noel L Cohen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  3 in total

1.  Real-Time Localization of Cochlear-Implant Electrode Arrays Using Bipolar Impedance Sensing.

Authors:  Trevor L Bruns; Katherine E Riojas; Robert F Labadie; Robert J Webster Iii
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  A dual wedge microneedle for sampling of perilymph solution via round window membrane.

Authors:  Hirobumi Watanabe; Luis Cardoso; Anil K Lalwani; Jeffrey W Kysar
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.838

3.  Effects of different electrodes used in bone-guided extracochlear implants on electrical stimulation of auditory nerves in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Chien-Hao Liu; Yung-Shan Lu; Po-Chun Chen; Chia-Fone Lee
Journal:  Tzu Chi Med J       Date:  2020-07-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.