Literature DB >> 22470051

Systemic immunity influences hearing preservation in cochlear implantation.

Melanie Souter1, Hayden Eastwood, Paul Marovic, Gordana Kel, Sarin Wongprasartsuk, Allen F Ryan, Stephen John O'Leary.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: To determine whether a systemic immune response influences hearing thresholds and tissue response after cochlear implantation of hearing guinea pigs.
METHODS: Guinea pigs were inoculated with sterile antigen (Keyhole limpet hemocyanin) 3 weeks before cochlear implantation. Pure-tone auditory brainstem response thresholds were performed before implantation and 1 and 4 weeks later. Dexamethasone phosphate 20% was adsorbed onto a hyaluronic acid carboxymethylcellulose sponge and was applied to the round window for 30 minutes before electrode insertion. Normal saline was used for controls. Cochlear histology was performed at 4 weeks after implantation to assess the tissue response to implantation. To control for the effect of keyhole limpet hemocyanin priming, a group of unprimed animals underwent cochlear implantation with a saline-soaked pledget applied to the round window.
RESULTS: Keyhole limpet hemocyanin priming had no significant detrimental effect on thresholds without implantation. Thresholds were elevated after implantation across all frequencies tested (2-32 kHz) in primed animals but only at higher frequencies (4-32 kHz) in unprimed controls. In primed animals, dexamethasone treatment significantly reduced threshold shifts at 2 and 8 kHz. Keyhole limpet hemocyanin led to the more frequent observation of lymphocytes in the tissue response to the implant.
CONCLUSION: Systemic immune activation at the time of cochlear implantation broadened the range of frequencies experiencing elevated thresholds after implantation. Local dexamethasone provides partial protection against this hearing loss, but the degree and extent of protection are less compared to previous studies with unprimed animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22470051      PMCID: PMC3897157          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31824bac44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  39 in total

1.  Preservation of residual hearing following cochlear implantation: comparison between three surgical techniques.

Authors:  S Berrettini; F Forli; S Passetti
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 1.469

2.  Acoustic trauma augments the cochlear immune response to antigen.

Authors:  Masumichi Miyao; Gary S Firestein; Elizabeth M Keithley
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Spontaneous increases in impedance following cochlear implantation: suspected causes and management.

Authors:  J Neuburger; T Lenarz; A Lesinski-Schiedat; A Büchner
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Application of a corticosteroid (Triamcinolon) protects inner ear function after surgical intervention.

Authors:  Qing Ye; Jochen Tillein; Rainer Hartmann; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Jan Kiefer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation.

Authors:  Wolfgang K Gstoettner; Paul van de Heyning; Alec Fitzgerald O'Connor; Constantino Morera; Manuel Sainz; Katrien Vermeire; Sonelle Mcdonald; Laura Cavallé; Silke Helbig; Juan García Valdecasas; Ilona Anderson; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.494

6.  Factors influencing the efficacy of round window dexamethasone protection of residual hearing post-cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Chang; Hayden Eastwood; David Sly; David James; Rachael Richardson; Stephen O'Leary
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Results from the first clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Timo Stöver; Andreas Buechner; Anke Lesinski-Schiedat; Jim Patrick; Joerg Pesch
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Effects of steroids and lubricants on electrical impedance and tissue response following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Christie Qi Huang; Michael Tykocinski; Dimitra Stathopoulos; Robert Cowan
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2007-09

9.  The long-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids on postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Gerrit Paasche; Claudia Tasche; Timo Stöver; Anke Lesinski-Schiedat; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Effects of round window dexamethasone on residual hearing in a Guinea pig model of cochlear implantation.

Authors:  David P James; Hayden Eastwood; Rachael T Richardson; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 1.854

View more
  3 in total

1.  Relationships between Intrascalar Tissue, Neuron Survival, and Cochlear Implant Function.

Authors:  Donald L Swiderski; Deborah J Colesa; Aaron P Hughes; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-20

2.  Development of a specially tailored local drug delivery system for the prevention of fibrosis after insertion of cochlear implants into the inner ear.

Authors:  Anne Bohl; Henning W Rohm; Piera Ceschi; Gerrit Paasche; Anne Hahn; Stephan Barcikowski; Thomas Lenarz; Timo Stöver; Hans-Wilhelm Pau; Klaus-Peter Schmitz; Katrin Sternberg
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Dexamethasone for Inner Ear Therapy: Biocompatibility and Bio-Efficacy of Different Dexamethasone Formulations In Vitro.

Authors:  Ziwen Gao; Jana Schwieger; Farnaz Matin-Mann; Peter Behrens; Thomas Lenarz; Verena Scheper
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-12-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.