Literature DB >> 28543270

Acoustic plus electric speech processing: Long-term results.

Bruce J Gantz1, Camille C Dunn1, Jacob Oleson2, Marlan R Hansen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have investigated the stability of residual hearing and speech perception outcomes in individuals who were implanted with a shorter electrode device. STUDY
DESIGN: Longitudinal, single-subject design.
METHODS: Fifty subjects who received a Nucleus Hybrid (Cochlear, Sydney, Australia) short electrode cochlear implant (CI) and had a minimum of 2 years (and up to 15 years) of postoperative longitudinal experience were included in this study. Twenty-three subjects received a Nucleus Hybrid S8 (S8); 14 subjects received a Nucleus Hybrid L24 (L24); and 13 received a Nucleus Hybrid S12 (S12). Audiometric thresholds and consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words were collected pre- and postoperatively for up to 15 years for the S8 subjects and for up to 7 years for the S12 and L24 subjects. AzBio Sentences in multi-talker babble was collected for up to 7 years on the S12 and L24 subjects.
RESULTS: Longitudinally, 83% of the S8 subjects, 92% of the S12 subjects, and 86% of the L24 subjects maintained a functional hearing pure-tone average (PTA) (125-500 Hz). Predicted change using a piecewise linear mixed model in PTA over time showed a postoperative linear decrease in hearing for each group until 0.5 years, after which the PTA stabilizes and is maintained. The averaged individual data for CNC and AzBio sentences show a significant improvement in scores by 0.25 to 0.5 years postimplantation, after which scores start to reach their maximum.
CONCLUSION: This long-term study demonstrates that acoustic-electric processing hearing and improvement in speech understanding in quiet and in noise can be accomplished and sustained for many years with a short electrode CI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2C. Laryngoscope, 128:473-481, 2018.
© 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hybrid; cochlear implant; long-term; residual hearing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28543270      PMCID: PMC5700847          DOI: 10.1002/lary.26669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  43 in total

Review 1.  New frontiers in cochlear implantation: acoustic plus electric hearing, hearing preservation, and more.

Authors:  Sarah E Mowry; Erika Woodson; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Chris J James; Bernard Fraysse; Olivier Deguine; Thomas Lenarz; Deborah Mawman; Angel Ramos; Richard Ramsden; Olivier Sterkers
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  L A J Reiss; C W Turner; S A Karsten; B J Gantz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  The Impact of Electrode Array Length on Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Marie-Charlot Suhling; Omid Majdani; Rolf Salcher; Melanie Leifholz; Andreas Büchner; Anke Lesinski-Schiedat; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Stability of low-frequency residual hearing in patients who are candidates for combined acoustic plus electric hearing.

Authors:  Wai Na Yao; Christopher W Turner; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 6.  The Hybrid cochlear implant: a review.

Authors:  Erika A Woodson; Lina A J Reiss; Christopher W Turner; Kate Gfeller; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

7.  Hybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary results.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Marlan R Hansen; Christopher W Turner; Jacob J Oleson; Lina A Reiss; Aaron J Parkinson
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Successful Hearing Preservation After Reimplantation of a Failed Hybrid Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Christine Etler; Marlan Hansen; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Delayed loss of hearing after hearing preservation cochlear implantation: Human temporal bone pathology and implications for etiology.

Authors:  Alicia M Quesnel; Hideko Heidi Nakajima; John J Rosowski; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  United States multicenter clinical trial of the cochlear nucleus hybrid implant system.

Authors:  J Thomas Roland; Bruce J Gantz; Susan B Waltzman; Aaron J Parkinson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  21 in total

1.  Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.

Authors:  Jeong-Seo Kim; Viral D Tejani; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  The Evolution of Statistical Methods in Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences.

Authors:  Jacob J Oleson; Grant D Brown; Ryan McCreery
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Supporting cell survival after cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Alvin deTorres; Rafal T Olszewski; Ivan A Lopez; Akira Ishiyama; Fred H Linthicum; Michael Hoa
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Relationship Between Intraoperative Electrocochleography and Hearing Preservation.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Andreas Buechner; Bruce Gantz; Marlan Hansen; Viral D Tejani; Robert Labadie; Brendan O'Connell; Craig Alan Buchman; Carla V Valenzuela; Oliver F Adunka; Michael S Harris; William J Riggs; Douglas Fitzpatrick; Kanthaiah Koka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with high-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  J Thomas Roland; Bruce J Gantz; Susan B Waltzman; Aaron J Parkinson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 6.  Electric and Acoustic Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Hearing Preservation.

Authors:  Christopher Welch; Margaret T Dillon; Harold C Pillsbury
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

7.  Nucleus Hybrid S12: Multicenter Clinical Trial Results.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Jacob Oleson; Aaron Parkinson; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Adaptation of the Standardized Hearing Outcomes Scattergram to Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Perkins; Nauman F Manzoor; David S Haynes; Matthew O'Malley; René Gifford; Alejandro Rivas
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Residual Hair Cell Responses in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Complete Loss of Acoustic Hearing After Implantation.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Jeong-Seo Kim; Jacob J Oleson; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-04

10.  The Reality of Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: Who Is Utilizing EAS?

Authors:  Elizabeth Perkins; Jaclyn Lee; Nauman Manzoor; Matthew O'Malley; Marc Bennett; Robert Labadie; Alejandro Rivas; David Haynes; René Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.