Literature DB >> 23539259

A systematic review of electric-acoustic stimulation: device fitting ranges, outcomes, and clinical fitting practices.

Paola V Incerti1, Teresa Y C Ching, Robert Cowan.   

Abstract

Cochlear implant systems that combine electric and acoustic stimulation in the same ear are now commercially available and the number of patients using these devices is steadily increasing. In particular, electric-acoustic stimulation is an option for patients with severe, high frequency sensorineural hearing impairment. There have been a range of approaches to combining electric stimulation and acoustic hearing in the same ear. To develop a better understanding of fitting practices for devices that combine electric and acoustic stimulation, we conducted a systematic review addressing three clinical questions: what is the range of acoustic hearing in the implanted ear that can be effectively preserved for an electric-acoustic fitting?; what benefits are provided by combining acoustic stimulation with electric stimulation?; and what clinical fitting practices have been developed for devices that combine electric and acoustic stimulation? A search of the literature was conducted and 27 articles that met the strict evaluation criteria adopted for the review were identified for detailed analysis. The range of auditory thresholds in the implanted ear that can be successfully used for an electric-acoustic application is quite broad. The effectiveness of combined electric and acoustic stimulation as compared with electric stimulation alone was consistently demonstrated, highlighting the potential value of preservation and utilization of low frequency hearing in the implanted ear. However, clinical procedures for best fitting of electric-acoustic devices were varied. This clearly identified a need for further investigation of fitting procedures aimed at maximizing outcomes for recipients of electric-acoustic devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23539259      PMCID: PMC4040864          DOI: 10.1177/1084713813480857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  53 in total

Review 1.  An introduction to evidence-based practice for hand therapists.

Authors:  Joy C MacDermid
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2004 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Chris J James; Bernard Fraysse; Olivier Deguine; Thomas Lenarz; Deborah Mawman; Angel Ramos; Richard Ramsden; Olivier Sterkers
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Christopher Turner; Jacob Oleson; Xuyang Zhang; Bruce Gantz; Rebecca Froman; Carol Olszewski
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Acceptance and fitting of the DUET device - a combined speech processor for electric acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Silke Helbig; Uwe Baumann
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

Review 6.  From electric acoustic stimulation to improved sound coding in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Peter Nopp; Marek Polak
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

7.  Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Timo Stover; Andreas Buechner; Gerrit Paasche; Robert Briggs; Frank Risi; Joerg Pesch; Rolf-Dieter Battmer
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 8.  The Hybrid cochlear implant: a review.

Authors:  Erika A Woodson; Lina A J Reiss; Christopher W Turner; Kate Gfeller; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

9.  Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Ann Perreau; Bruce Gantz; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Hybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary results.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Marlan R Hansen; Christopher W Turner; Jacob J Oleson; Lina A Reiss; Aaron J Parkinson
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.854

View more
  22 in total

1.  Effects of Removing Low-Frequency Electric Information on Speech Perception With Bimodal Hearing.

Authors:  Jennifer R Fowler; Jessica L Eggleston; Kelly M Reavis; Garnett P McMillan; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Low-frequency signals support perceptual organization of implant-simulated speech for adults and children.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Eric Tarr; Virginia Bolster; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Carolyn J Brown; Eun Kyung Jeon; Li-Kuei Chiou; Benjamin Kirby; Sue A Karsten; Christopher W Turner; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Visualization, measurement and modelling of the cochlea using rotating midmodiolar slice planes.

Authors:  G Jakob Lexow; Daniel Schurzig; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Insertion trauma of a cochlear implant electrode array with Nitinol inlay.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Lenka Harbach; Nick Pawsey; Marcel Kluge; Peter Erfurt; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; Nathaniel R Peterson; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk; Xin Yang; Jason Parton
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.288

7.  Comparison of two cochlear implant coding strategies on speech perception.

Authors:  Margaret T Dillon; Emily Buss; English R King; Ellen J Deres; Sarah N Obarowski; Meredith L Anderson; Marcia C Adunka
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2016-10-18

8.  Long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with high-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  J Thomas Roland; Bruce J Gantz; Susan B Waltzman; Aaron J Parkinson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 9.  Electric and Acoustic Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Hearing Preservation.

Authors:  Christopher Welch; Margaret T Dillon; Harold C Pillsbury
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

10.  Effectiveness of Place-based Mapping in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Margaret T Dillon; Michael W Canfarotta; Emily Buss; Joseph Hopfinger; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.