Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.

Literature DB >> 18057874

The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.

Michael F Dorman¹, Rene H Gifford, Anthony J Spahr, Sharon A McKarns.

Abstract

Fifteen patients fit with a cochlear implant in one ear and a hearing aid in the other ear were presented with tests of speech and melody recognition and voice discrimination under conditions of electric (E) stimulation, acoustic (A) stimulation and combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS). When acoustic information was added to electrically stimulated information performance increased by 17-23 percentage points on tests of word and sentence recognition in quiet and sentence recognition in noise. On average, the EAS patients achieved higher scores on CNC words than patients fit with a unilateral cochlear implant. While the best EAS patients did not outperform the best patients fit with a unilateral cochlear implant, proportionally more EAS patients achieved very high scores on tests of speech recognition than unilateral cochlear implant patients. (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities: Species

Mesh：

Year: 2007 PMID： 18057874 PMCID： PMC3559130 DOI： 10.1159/000111782

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Audiol Neurootol ISSN： 1420-3030 Impact factor: 1.854

17 in total

1. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing.

Authors: Christopher W Turner; Bruce J Gantz; Corina Vidal; Amy Behrens; Belinda A Henry
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 1.840

2. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study.

Authors: Jan Kiefer; Marcel Pok; Oliver Adunka; Ekkehard Stürzebecher; Wolfgang Baumgartner; Marcus Schmidt; Jochen Tillein; Qing Ye; Wolfgang Gstoettner
Journal: Audiol Neurootol Date: 2005-02-17 Impact factor: 1.854

3. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.

Authors: Bruce J Gantz; Christopher Turner; Kate E Gfeller; Mary W Lowder
Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 3.325

4. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors: Ying-Yee Kong; Ginger S Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 1.840

5. Effects of introducing unprocessed low-frequency information on the reception of envelope-vocoder processed speech.

Authors: Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 1.840

6. Unintelligible low-frequency sound enhances simulated cochlear-implant speech recognition in noise.

Authors: Janice E Chang; John Y Bai; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.538

7. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests.

Authors: G E PETERSON; I LEHISTE
Journal: J Speech Hear Disord Date: 1962-02

8. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears.

Authors: Teresa Y C Ching; Paula Incerti; Mandy Hill
Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.570

9. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss.

Authors: C von Ilberg; J Kiefer; J Tillein; T Pfenningdorff; R Hartmann; E Stürzebecher; R Klinke
Journal: ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec Date: 1999 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.538

10. Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems: effects of input dynamic range.

Authors: Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Louise H Loiselle
Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.570

106 in total

1. Assessing spoken word recognition in children who are deaf or hard of hearing: a translational approach.

Authors: Karen Iler Kirk; Lindsay Prusick; Brian French; Chad Gotch; Laurie S Eisenberg; Nancy Young
Journal: J Am Acad Audiol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 1.664

2. Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors: Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal: J Am Acad Audiol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 1.664

3. The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.

Authors: Benjamin M Sheffield; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 1.840

4. Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors: Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 1.840

5. Talker-identification training using simulations of binaurally combined electric and acoustic hearing: generalization to speech and emotion recognition.

Authors: Vidya Krull; Xin Luo; Karen Iler Kirk
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 1.840

10. A Preliminary Investigation of the Air-Bone Gap: Changes in Intracochlear Sound Pressure With Air- and Bone-conducted Stimuli After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors: Renee M Banakis Hartl; Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Stephen P Cass; Daniel J Tollin
Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 2.311