Literature DB >> 19062856

Hearing preservation surgery: psychophysical estimates of cochlear damage in recipients of a short electrode array.

René H Gifford1, Michael F Dorman, Anthony J Spahr, Sid P Bacon, Henryk Skarzynski, Artur Lorens.   

Abstract

In the newest implementation of cochlear implant surgery, electrode arrays of 10 or 20 mm are inserted into the cochlea with the aim of preserving hearing in the region apical to the tip of the electrode array. In the current study two measures were used to assess hearing preservation: changes in audiometric threshold and changes in psychophysical estimates of nonlinear cochlear processing. Nonlinear cochlear processing was evaluated at signal frequencies of 250 and 500 Hz using Schroeder phase maskers with various indices of masker phase curvature. A total of 15 normal-hearing listeners and 13 cochlear implant patients (7 with a 10 mm insertion and 6 with a 20 mm insertion) were tested. Following surgery the mean low-frequency threshold elevation was 12.7 dB (125-750 Hz). Nine patients had postimplant thresholds within 5-10 dB of preimplant thresholds. Only one patient, however, demonstrated a completely normal nonlinear cochlear function following surgery--although most retained some degree of residual nonlinear processing. This result indicates (i) that Schroeder phase masking functions are a more sensitive index of surgical trauma than audiometric threshold and (ii) that preservation of a normal cochlear function in the apex of the cochlea is relatively uncommon but possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19062856      PMCID: PMC2736714          DOI: 10.1121/1.2967842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  36 in total

1.  Frequency selectivity in workers with noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  C Laroche; R Hétu; H T Quoc; B Josserand; B Glasberg
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  [Cochlear implantation with preservation of residual deep frequency hearing].

Authors:  W Gstöttner; S-M Pok; S Peters; J Kiefer; O Adunka
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Christopher Turner; Kate E Gfeller; Mary W Lowder
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Acoustic plus electric speech processing: preliminary results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid implant.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Christopher Turner; Kate E Gfeller
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial.

Authors:  Thomas Balkany; Annelle Hodges; Christine Menapace; Linda Hazard; Colin Driscoll; Bruce Gantz; David Kelsall; William Luxford; Sean McMenomy; J Gail Neely; Brian Peters; Harold Pillsbury; Joseph Roberson; David Schramm; Steven Telian; Susan Waltzman; Brian Westerberg; Stacy Payne
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Jon K Shallop; Anna Mary Peterson
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests.

Authors:  G E PETERSON; I LEHISTE
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1962-02

8.  Reductions in overshoot during aspirin use.

Authors:  D McFadden; C A Champlin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A new method of partial deafness treatment.

Authors:  Henryk Skarzyński; Artur Lorens; Anna Piotrowska
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2003-04

10.  Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  20 in total

1.  Current research with cochlear implants at Arizona State University.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Anthony Spahr; Rene H Gifford; Sarah Cook; Ting Zhang; Louise Loiselle; William Yost; Lara Cardy; JoAnne Whittingham; David Schramm
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.

Authors:  Benjamin M Sheffield; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Hybrid S8 cochlear implant: Final outcomes.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Camille Dunn; Jacob Oleson; Marlan Hansen; Aaron Parkinson; Christopher Turner
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Perception of consonants in reverberation and noise by adults fitted with bimodal devices.

Authors:  Michelle Mason; Kostas Kokkinakis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Paul J Abbas; Viral D Tejani; Rachel A Scheperle; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.

Authors:  Jeong-Seo Kim; Viral D Tejani; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  [Hearing with combined electric acoustic stimulation].

Authors:  U Baumann; S Helbig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  The use of fundamental frequency for lexical segmentation in listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Stephanie Spitzer; Julie Liss; Tony Spahr; Michael Dorman; Kaitlin Lansford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

10.  Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Colin L W Driscoll; Peter Roland; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.