BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Optimal tube voltage and tube current settings are not well established. The purpose of our study was to investigate the image quality on 3D CT angiograms of the brain at various kilovoltage settings by evaluating the depiction of simulated intracranial lesions by using a vascular phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropomorphic vascular phantom with superimposed bone skull structures was designed to simulate various intracranial aneurysms with aneurysmal blebs. We performed CT angiography by using a 64-detector row CT scanner for various effective tube currents with 4 tube voltages of 80, 100, 120, and 135 kV(p). Simulated aneurysm enhancement and image noise were quantified; SNR and CNR were calculated. The depiction of the simulated aneurysms and blebs on 3D CT angiograms obtained with the volume-rendering technique was subjectively assessed. The effective dose was calculated on the basis of a CTDIw. The results of several protocols were compared by using the Student t test. RESULTS: At identical doses levels (CTDIw), the mean SNR and CNR at 100 kV(p) were significantly higher than those at 80, 120, and 135 kV(p); and the mean qualitative image score at 100 kV(p) was significantly superior to those at 80 and 135 kV(p). CONCLUSIONS: Our phantom study suggests that the tube voltage of 100 kV(p) is desirable for cerebral 3D CT angiograms, and the higher or lower kilovoltage settings may result in the degradation in diagnostic image quality.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Optimal tube voltage and tube current settings are not well established. The purpose of our study was to investigate the image quality on 3D CT angiograms of the brain at various kilovoltage settings by evaluating the depiction of simulated intracranial lesions by using a vascular phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropomorphic vascular phantom with superimposed bone skull structures was designed to simulate various intracranial aneurysms with aneurysmal blebs. We performed CT angiography by using a 64-detector row CT scanner for various effective tube currents with 4 tube voltages of 80, 100, 120, and 135 kV(p). Simulated aneurysm enhancement and image noise were quantified; SNR and CNR were calculated. The depiction of the simulated aneurysms and blebs on 3D CT angiograms obtained with the volume-rendering technique was subjectively assessed. The effective dose was calculated on the basis of a CTDIw. The results of several protocols were compared by using the Student t test. RESULTS: At identical doses levels (CTDIw), the mean SNR and CNR at 100 kV(p) were significantly higher than those at 80, 120, and 135 kV(p); and the mean qualitative image score at 100 kV(p) was significantly superior to those at 80 and 135 kV(p). CONCLUSIONS: Our phantom study suggests that the tube voltage of 100 kV(p) is desirable for cerebral 3D CT angiograms, and the higher or lower kilovoltage settings may result in the degradation in diagnostic image quality.
Authors: Birgit B Ertl-Wagner; Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann; Roland Bruning; Karin Herrmann; Brad Snyder; Jeffrey D Blume; Maximilian F Reiser Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-03-24 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Mark E Mullins; Michael H Lev; Peter Bove; Cara E O'Reilly; Sanjay Saini; James T Rhea; James H Thrall; George J Hunter; Leena M Hamberg; R Gilberto Gonzalez Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Annet Waaijer; Mathias Prokop; Birgitta K Velthuis; Chris J G Bakker; Gerard A P de Kort; Maarten S van Leeuwen Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-01-17 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: M Wintermark; P Maeder; F R Verdun; J P Thiran; J F Valley; P Schnyder; R Meuli Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: B Lubicz; M Levivier; O François; P Thoma; N Sadeghi; L Collignon; D Balériaux Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-09-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Anne B Sigal-Cinqualbre; Remi Hennequin; Hicham T Abada; Xiaoyan Chen; Jean-François Paul Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-02-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: L Schimmöller; R S Lanzman; P Heusch; S Dietrich; F Miese; J Aissa; T A Heusner; G Antoch; P Kröpil Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: O Museyko; A Heinemann; M Krause; B Wulff; M Amling; K Püschel; C C Glüer; W Kalender; K Engelke Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-10-19 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Stefanie Kirschner; Bettina Mürle; Manuela Felix; Anna Arns; Christoph Groden; Frederik Wenz; Andreas Hug; Gerhard Glatting; Martin Kramer; Frank A Giordano; Marc A Brockmann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 3.240