BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to assess intertechnique and interobserver reproducibility of 64-row multisection CT angiography (CTA) used to detect and evaluate intracranial aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 2005 to November 2006, 54 consecutive patients with nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) underwent both CTA and digital substraction angiography (DSA). Four radiologists independently reviewed CT images, and 2 other radiologists reviewed DSA images. Aneurysm diameter (D), neck width (N), and the presence of a branch arising from the sac were assessed. RESULTS: DSA revealed 67 aneurysms in 48 patients and no aneurysm in 6 patients. Mean sensitivity and specificity of CTA for the detection of intracranial aneurysms were, respectively, 94% and 90.2%. For aneurysms less than 3 mm, CTA had a mean sensitivity of 70.4%. Intertechnique and interobserver agreements were good for the detection of aneurysms (mean kappa = 0.673 and 0.732, respectively) and for the measurement of their necks (mean kappa = 0.753 and 0.779, respectively). Intertechnique and interobserver agreements were excellent for the measurement of aneurysm diameters (mean kappa = 0.847 and 0.876, respectively). In addition, CTA was accurate in determining the N/D ratio of aneurysms and adjacent arterial branches. However, the N/D ratio was overestimated by all of the readers at CTA. CONCLUSION: Sixty-four-row multisection CTA is an imaging method with a good interobserver reproducibility and a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection and the morphologic evaluation of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. It may be used as an alternative to DSA as a first-intention imaging technique in patients with SAH.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to assess intertechnique and interobserver reproducibility of 64-row multisection CT angiography (CTA) used to detect and evaluate intracranial aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 2005 to November 2006, 54 consecutive patients with nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) underwent both CTA and digital substraction angiography (DSA). Four radiologists independently reviewed CT images, and 2 other radiologists reviewed DSA images. Aneurysm diameter (D), neck width (N), and the presence of a branch arising from the sac were assessed. RESULTS: DSA revealed 67 aneurysms in 48 patients and no aneurysm in 6 patients. Mean sensitivity and specificity of CTA for the detection of intracranial aneurysms were, respectively, 94% and 90.2%. For aneurysms less than 3 mm, CTA had a mean sensitivity of 70.4%. Intertechnique and interobserver agreements were good for the detection of aneurysms (mean kappa = 0.673 and 0.732, respectively) and for the measurement of their necks (mean kappa = 0.753 and 0.779, respectively). Intertechnique and interobserver agreements were excellent for the measurement of aneurysm diameters (mean kappa = 0.847 and 0.876, respectively). In addition, CTA was accurate in determining the N/D ratio of aneurysms and adjacent arterial branches. However, the N/D ratio was overestimated by all of the readers at CTA. CONCLUSION: Sixty-four-row multisection CTA is an imaging method with a good interobserver reproducibility and a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection and the morphologic evaluation of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. It may be used as an alternative to DSA as a first-intention imaging technique in patients with SAH.
Authors: M R Mayberg; H H Batjer; R Dacey; M Diringer; E C Haley; R C Heros; L L Sternau; J Torner; H P Adams; W Feinberg Journal: Stroke Date: 1994-11 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Maria T Karamessini; George C Kagadis; Theodore Petsas; Dimitrios Karnabatidis; Dimitrios Konstantinou; George C Sakellaropoulos; George C Nikiforidis; Dimitrios Siablis Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Mahesh V Jayaraman; William W Mayo-Smith; Glenn A Tung; Richard A Haas; Jeffrey M Rogg; Neerav R Mehta; Curtis E Doberstein Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-12-29 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J Pablo Villablanca; Parizad Hooshi; Neil Martin; Reza Jahan; Gary Duckwiler; Sylvester Lim; John Frazee; Y Pierre Gobin; James Sayre; John Bentson; Fernando Viñuela Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Hye Jeong Kim; Dae Young Yoon; Eun Soo Kim; Hyung Jin Lee; Hong Jun Jeon; Jong Young Lee; Byung-Moon Cho Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-03-25 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: R Agid; T Andersson; H Almqvist; R A Willinsky; S-K Lee; K G terBrugge; R I Farb; M Söderman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-11-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Y Murakami; S Kakeda; K Kamada; N Ohnari; J Nishimura; M Ogawa; K Otsubo; Y Morishita; Y Korogi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-11-26 Impact factor: 3.825