Literature DB >> 24273743

Effects of different tube potentials and iodine concentrations on image enhancement, contrast-to-noise ratio and noise in micro-CT images: a phantom study.

Hairil Rashmizal Abdul Razak1, Said Mohd Shaffiq Said Rahmat, Wan Mazlina Md Saad.   

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the effects of different tube potentials and concentrations of iodinated contrast media (CM) on the image enhancement, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and noise in micro-computed tomography (µCT) images. A phantom containing of five polyethylene tube was filled with 2 mL of deionized water and iodinated CM (Omnipaque 300 mgI/mL) at four different concentrations: 5, 10, 15, and 20 mol/L, respectively. The phantom was scanned with a µCT machine (SkyScan 1176) using various tube potentials: 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 kVp, a fixed tube current; 100 µA, and filtration of 0.2 mm aluminum (Al). The percentage difference of image enhancement, CNR and noise of all images, acquired at different kVps and concentrations, were calculated. The image enhancement, CNR and noise curves with respect to tube potential and concentration were plotted and analysed. The highest image enhancement was found at the lowest tube potential of 40 kVp. At this kVp setting, the percentage difference of image enhancement [Hounsfield Unit (HU) of 20 mol/L iodine concentration over HU of deionized water] was 43%. By increasing the tube potential, it resulted with the reduction of HU, where only 17.5% different were noticed for 90 kVp. Across all iodine concentrations (5-20 M), CNR peaked at 80 kVp and then these values showed a slight decreasing pattern, which might be due insufficient tube current compensation. The percentage difference of image noise obtained at 40 and 90 kVp was 72.4%. Lower tube potential setting results in higher image enhancement (HU) in conjunction with increasing concentration of iodinated CM. Overall, the tube potential increment will substantially improve CNR and reduce image noise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tube potential; iodine concentration; micro-computed tomography (µCT)

Year:  2013        PMID: 24273743      PMCID: PMC3834201          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2013.10.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  28 in total

1.  Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT.

Authors:  W Huda; E M Scalzetti; G Levin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  High resolution X-ray computed tomography: an emerging tool for small animal cancer research.

Authors:  M J Paulus; S S Gleason; S J Kennel; P R Hunsicker; D K Johnson
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Automated region detection based on the contrast-to-noise ratio in near-infrared tomography.

Authors:  Xiaomei Song; Brian W Pogue; Shudong Jiang; Marvin M Doyley; Hamid Dehghani; Tor D Tosteson; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 1.980

4.  Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure.

Authors:  J L Kuhn; S A Goldstein; L A Feldkamp; R W Goulet; G Jesion
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  CT angiography of the renal arteries: comparison of lower-tube-voltage CTA with moderate-concentration iodinated contrast material and conventional CTA.

Authors:  Eun-Suk Cho; Jeong-Sik Yu; Jhii-Hyun Ahn; Joo Hee Kim; Jae-Joon Chung; Hyeon-Kyeong Lee; Kyung Hee Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches.

Authors:  Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Contrast enhanced vessel imaging using microCT.

Authors:  Suresh I Prajapati; Charles Keller
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 8.  The role of micro-computed tomography in forensic investigations.

Authors:  G N Rutty; A Brough; M J P Biggs; C Robinson; S D A Lawes; S V Hainsworth
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 9.  Adverse reactions to contrast material: recognition, prevention, and treatment.

Authors:  Thomas G Maddox
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 3.292

10.  Low-dose multidetector CT angiography in the evaluation of infrarenal aorta and peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

Authors:  Roberto Iezzi; Marco Santoro; Riccardo Marano; Carmine Di Stasi; Roberta Dattesi; Miles Kirchin; Giovanni Tinelli; Francesco Snider; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  In vivo performance of gold nanoparticle-loaded absorbable inferior vena cava filters in a swine model.

Authors:  Steven Y Huang; Jossana A Damasco; Li Tian; Linfeng Lu; Joy Vanessa D Perez; Katherine A Dixon; Malea L Williams; Megan C Jacobsen; Stephen J Dria; Mitchell D Eggers; Adam D Melancon; Rick R Layman; Elizabeth M Whitley; Marites P Melancon
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 6.843

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.