Literature DB >> 19927675

Effects of expansion on consonant recognition and consonant audibility.

Marc Brennan1, Pamela Souza.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hearing aid expansion is intended to reduce the gain for low-level noise. However, expansion can also degrade low-intensity speech. Although it has been suggested that the poorer performance with expansion is due to reduced audibility, this has not been measured directly. Furthermore, previous studies used relatively high expansion kneepoints.
PURPOSE: This study compared the effect of a 30 dB SPL and 50 dB SPL expansion kneepoint on consonant audibility and recognition. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Eight consonant-vowel syllables were presented at 50, 60, and 71 dB SPL. Recordings near the tympanic membrane were made of each speech token and used to calculate the Aided Audibility Index (AAI). STUDY SAMPLE: Thirteen subjects with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
RESULTS: Expansion with a high kneepoint resulted in reduced consonant recognition. The AAI correlated significantly with consonant recognition across all conditions and subjects.
CONCLUSION: If consonant recognition is the priority, audibility calculations could be used to determine an optimal expansion kneepoint for a given individual.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19927675      PMCID: PMC2784644          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.20.2.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  31 in total

1.  The contribution of amplitude envelope cues to sentence identification in young and aged listeners.

Authors:  P E Souza; V Kitch
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Effect of compression ratio on speech recognition and speech-quality ratings with wide dynamic range compression amplification.

Authors:  K T Boike; P E Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Perception of voiceless fricatives by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children and adults.

Authors:  A L Pittman; P G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.

Authors:  M Boymans; W A Dreschler
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

5.  Use of the 'real-ear to dial difference' to derive real-ear SPL from hearing level obtained with insert earphones.

Authors:  K J Munro; A Lazenby
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  2001-10

6.  Compression and expansion of the temporal envelope: evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality.

Authors:  R A van Buuren; J M Festen; T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Quantifying the contribution of audibility to recognition of compression-amplified speech.

Authors:  P E Souza; C W Turner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The effects of expansion on the objective and subjective performance of hearing instrument users.

Authors:  Patrick N Plyler; Ashley Blair Hill; Timothy D Trine
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Older listeners' use of temporal cues altered by compression amplification.

Authors:  P E Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal- and hearing-impaired children and adults.

Authors:  P G Stelmachowicz; A L Pittman; B M Hoover; D E Lewis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Temporal resolution with a prescriptive fitting formula.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Frederick J Gallun; Pamela E Souza; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Audibility and Spectral-Ripple Discrimination Thresholds as Predictors of Word Recognition with Nonlinear Frequency Compression.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 1.245

3.  Self-Adjustment of Hearing Aid Amplification for Lower Speech Levels: Independent Ratings, Paired Comparisons, and Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Trevor T Perry; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Perceptual Implications of Level- and Frequency-Specific Deviations from Hearing Aid Prescription in Children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Marc Brennan; Elizabeth A Walker; Meredith Spratford
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Influence of Audibility and Distortion on Recognition of Reverberant Speech for Children and Adults with Hearing Aid Amplification.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery; John Massey
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 1.245

6.  Electroacoustic Comparison of Hearing Aid Output of Phonemes in Running Speech versus Isolation: Implications for Aided Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Testing.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; David W Purcell; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-12-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.