Literature DB >> 11324840

The contribution of amplitude envelope cues to sentence identification in young and aged listeners.

P E Souza1, V Kitch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the importance of amplitude envelope cues to sentence identification for aged listeners. We also examined the effect of increasing alterations (i.e., compression ratio) and amount of available frequency content (i.e., number of channels) for this population.
DESIGN: Thirty-six listeners were classified according to their age (35 or younger versus 65 and older) and hearing status (normal hearing versus hearing impaired). Within each hearing status, mean hearing threshold thresholds for the young and aged listeners were matched as closely as possible through 4 kHz to control for sensitivity differences across age, and all listeners passed a cognitive screening battery. Accuracy of synthetic sentence identification was measured using stimuli processed to restrict spectral information. Performance was measured as a function of age, hearing status, amount of spectral information, and degradation of the amplitude envelope (using fast-acting compression with compression ratios ranging from 1:1 to 5:1).
RESULTS: Mean identification scores decreased significantly with increasing age, the presence of hear- c ing loss, the removal of spectral information, and with increasing distortion of the amplitude envelope (i.e., higher compression ratios). There was a consistent performance gap between young and aged listeners, regardless of the magnitude of change to the amplitude envelope. This suggests that some cue other than amplitude envelope variations is inaccessible to the aged listeners.
CONCLUSIONS: Although aged listeners performed more poorly overall, they did not show greater susceptibility to alterations in amplitude-envelope cues, such as those produced by fast-acting amplitude compression systems. It is therefore unlikely that compression parameters such as attack and release time or compression ratio would need to be a differentially programmed for aged listeners. Instead, the data suggest two possibilities: aged listeners have difficulty accessing the fine-structure temporal cues present in speech, and/or performance is degraded by age-related loss of function at a central processing level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11324840     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200104000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  12 in total

1.  Correction of the peripheral spatiotemporal response pattern: a potential new signal-processing strategy.

Authors:  Lu-Feng Shi; Laurel H Carney; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Aged-related loss of temporal processing: altered responses to amplitude modulated tones in rat dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  T A Schatteman; L F Hughes; D M Caspary
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Robust Neuronal Discrimination in Primary Auditory Cortex Despite Degradations of Spectro-temporal Acoustic Details: Comparison Between Guinea Pigs with Normal Hearing and Mild Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yonane Aushana; Samira Souffi; Jean-Marc Edeline; Christian Lorenzi; Chloé Huetz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-04

4.  Effects of compression on speech acoustics, intelligibility, and sound quality.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-12

5.  Effect of hearing aid release time and presentation level on speech perception in noise in elderly individuals with hearing loss.

Authors:  Jijo Pottackal Mathai; Hasheem Mohammed
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Individual sensitivity to spectral and temporal cues in listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Richard A Wright; Michael C Blackburn; Rachael Tatman; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Kathryn Arehart; Christi Wise Miller; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Diane Kewley-Port; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of expansion on consonant recognition and consonant audibility.

Authors:  Marc Brennan; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Recognition of spectrally degraded phonemes by younger, middle-aged, and older normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz; Monita Chatterjee; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.