Literature DB >> 11093610

Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.

M Boymans1, W A Dreschler.   

Abstract

In this study, we measured the effects of a digital hearing aid on speech recognition or reception in noise for two noise reduction concepts: active noise reduction by speech-sensitive processing (SSP) and improved directionality by a dual- or so-called twin-microphone system (TMS). This was conducted in a well-controlled clinical field trial in 16 hearing-aid users, using a single-blind crossover design. The hearing aid fitting was controlled by insertion gain measurements and measurements with loudness scaling. This study combined laboratory experiments with three consecutive field trials of 4 weeks each. We used performance measurements (speech recognition tests in background noise), paired comparisons, and self-report measurements (questionnaires). The speech recognition or reception tests were performed before and after each field trial, the paired comparisons were performed in weeks 4 and 12, and the questionnaires were administered after each field trial. For all subjects, results were obtained for three different settings: no noise reduction, SSP alone, and TMS alone. In the last week, we also performed speech recognition or reception tests in background noise with both noise reduction concepts combined. Three types of results have been reported: "objective" results from the critical signal to noise ratios for speech recognition or reception in different background noises for different settings and "subjective" results: paired comparisons and questionnaires. The subjective scores show the same trend as the objective scores. The effects of TMS were clearly positive, especially for the speech reception threshold tests and for the paired comparisons. The effects of SSP were much smaller but showed significant benefits with respect to aversiveness and speech perception or reception in noise for specific acoustical environments. There was no extra benefit from the combined effect of SSP and TMS relative to TMS alone.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11093610     DOI: 10.3109/00206090009073090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiology        ISSN: 0020-6091


  24 in total

1.  A method to remove differences in frequency response between commercial hearing aids to allow direct comparison of the sound quality of hearing-aid features.

Authors:  Rolph Houben; Inge Brons; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-11-07

Review 2.  Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms.

Authors:  King Chung
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

Review 3.  [New aspects of hearing aid fitting in noise-induced hearing loss].

Authors:  J Kiessling
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise.

Authors:  H Gustav Mueller; Jennifer Weber; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

Review 5.  Digital noise reduction: an overview.

Authors:  Ruth Bentler; Li-Kuei Chiou
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

6.  A historical perspective on digital hearing AIDS: how digital technology has changed modern hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Harry Levitt
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-03

7.  Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds.

Authors:  Catherine V Palmer; Ruth Bentler; H Gustav Mueller
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

8.  Effects of digital noise reduction on speech perception for children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Patricia Stelmachowicz; Dawna Lewis; Brenda Hoover; Kanae Nishi; Ryan McCreery; William Woods
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effects of expansion on consonant recognition and consonant audibility.

Authors:  Marc Brennan; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction.

Authors:  Samantha Gustafson; Ryan McCreery; Brenda Hoover; Judy G Kopun; Pat Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.