Literature DB >> 11681394

Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal- and hearing-impaired children and adults.

P G Stelmachowicz1, A L Pittman, B M Hoover, D E Lewis.   

Abstract

Recent studies with adults have suggested that amplification at 4 kHz and above fails to improve speech recognition and may even degrade performance when high-frequency thresholds exceed 50-60 dB HL. This study examined the extent to which high frequencies can provide useful information for fricative perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children and adults. Eighty subjects (20 per group) participated. Nonsense syllables containing the phonemes /s/, /f/, and /O/, produced by a male, female, and child talker, were low-pass filtered at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9 kHz. Frequency shaping was provided for the hearing-impaired subjects only. Results revealed significant differences in recognition between the four groups of subjects. Specifically, both groups of children performed more poorly than their adult counterparts at similar bandwidths. Likewise, both hearing-impaired groups performed more poorly than their normal-hearing counterparts. In addition, significant talker effects for /s/ were observed. For the male talker, optimum performance was reached at a bandwidth of approximately 4-5 kHz, whereas optimum performance for the female and child talkers did not occur until a bandwidth of 9 kHz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11681394     DOI: 10.1121/1.1400757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  71 in total

1.  Inverse solution of ear-canal area function from reflectance.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Production of contrast between sibilant fricatives by children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Jan R Edwards; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Horizontal directivity of low- and high-frequency energy in speech and singing.

Authors:  Brian B Monson; Eric J Hunter; Brad H Story
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech sound production in 2-year-olds who are hard of hearing.

Authors:  Sophie E Ambrose; Lauren M Unflat Berry; Elizabeth A Walker; Melody Harrison; Jacob Oleson; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Multiple looks in speech sound discrimination in adults.

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Arlene Earley Carney
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Effect of probe tube insertion depth on spectral measures of speech.

Authors:  Marc Caldwell; Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

7.  Rapid word-learning in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children: effects of age, receptive vocabulary, and high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  A L Pittman; D E Lewis; B M Hoover; P G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Effects of stimulus bandwidth on the imitation of ish fricatives by normal-hearing children.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Kanae Nishi; Sangsook Choi; Dawna E Lewis; Brenda M Hoover; Darcia Dierking; Andrew Lotto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Use of forward pressure level to minimize the influence of acoustic standing waves during probe-microphone hearing-aid verification.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Andrea Pittman; James Lewis; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Frequency-lowering devices for managing high-frequency hearing loss: a review.

Authors:  Andrea Simpson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.