Literature DB >> 10877436

Older listeners' use of temporal cues altered by compression amplification.

P E Souza1.   

Abstract

This study compared the ability of younger and older listeners to use temporal information in speech when that information was altered by compression amplification. Recognition of vowel-consonant-vowel syllables was measured for four groups of adult listeners (younger normal hearing, older normal hearing, younger hearing impaired, older hearing impaired). There were four conditions. Syllables were processed with wide-dynamic range compression (WDRC) amplification and with linear amplification. In each of those conditions, recognition was measured for syllables containing only temporal information and for syllables containing spectral and temporal information. Recognition of WDRC-amplified speech provided an estimate of the ability to use altered amplitude envelope cues. Syllables were presented with a high-frequency masker to minimize confounding differences in high-frequency sensitivity between the younger and older groups. Scores were lower for WDRC-amplified speech than for linearly amplified speech, and older listeners performed more poorly than younger listeners. When spectral information was unrestricted, the age-related decrement was similar for both amplification types. When spectral information was restricted for listeners with normal hearing, the age-related decrement was greater for WDRC-amplified speech than for linearly amplified speech. When spectral information was restricted for listeners with hearing loss, the age-related decrement was similar for both amplification types. Clinically, these results imply that when spectral cues are available (i.e., when the listener has adequate spectral resolution) older listeners can use WDRC hearing aids to the same extent as younger listeners. For older listeners without hearing loss, poorer scores for compression-amplified speech suggest an age-related deficit in temporal resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10877436     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4303.661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  6 in total

1.  Effects of compression on speech acoustics, intelligibility, and sound quality.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-12

2.  Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Kathryn Arehart; Christi Wise Miller; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Using Auditory Characteristics to Select Hearing Aid Compression Speeds for Presbycusic Patients.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Jing Chen; Yanmei Zhang; Baoxuan Sun; Yuhe Liu
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.702

4.  Effects of expansion on consonant recognition and consonant audibility.

Authors:  Marc Brennan; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 5.  Audiologic management of older adults with hearing loss and compromised cognitive/psychoacoustic auditory processing capabilities.

Authors:  Patricia B Kricos
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-03

6.  Speech Understanding in Modulated Noise and Speech Maskers as a Function of Cognitive Status in Older Adults.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 1.636

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.