Literature DB >> 35176803

Audibility and Spectral-Ripple Discrimination Thresholds as Predictors of Word Recognition with Nonlinear Frequency Compression.

Marc A Brennan1, Ryan W McCreery2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonlinear frequency compression (NFC) lowers high-frequency sounds to a lower frequency and is used to improve high-frequency audibility. However, the efficacy of NFC varies widely-while some individuals benefit from NFC, many do not. Spectral resolution is one factor that might explain individual benefit from NFC. Because individuals with better spectral resolution understand more speech than those with poorer spectral resolution, it was hypothesized that individual benefit from NFC could be predicted from the change in spectral resolution measured with NFC relative to a condition without NFC.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the impact of NFC on access to spectral information and whether these changes predict individual benefit from NFC for adults with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). RESEARCH
DESIGN: Present study is a quasi-experimental cohort study. Participants used a pair of hearing aids set to the Desired Sensation Level algorithm (DSL m[i/o]). STUDY SAMPLE: Participants were 19 adults with SNHL, recruited from the Boys Town National Research Hospital Participant Registry. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Participants were seated in a sound-attenuating booth and then percent-correct recognition of words, and spectral-ripple discrimination thresholds were measured for two different conditions, with and without NFC. Because audibility is known to influence spectral-ripple thresholds and benefit from NFC, audibility was quantified using the aided speech intelligibility index (SII). Linear mixed models were generated to predict word recognition using the aided SII and spectral-ripple discrimination thresholds.
RESULTS: While NFC did not influence percent-correct word recognition, participants with higher (better) aided SII and spectral-ripple discrimination thresholds understood more words than those with either a lower aided SII or spectral-ripple discrimination threshold. Benefit from NFC was not predictable from a participant's aided SII or spectral-ripple discrimination threshold.
CONCLUSION: We have extended previous work on the effect of audibility on benefit from NFC to include a measure of spectral resolution, the spectral-ripple discrimination threshold. Clinically, these results suggest that patients with better audibility and spectral resolution will understand speech better than those with poorer audibility or spectral resolution; however, these results are inconsistent with the notion that individual benefit from NFC is predictable from aided audibility or spectral resolution. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35176803      PMCID: PMC9112840          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.245


  62 in total

1.  The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Belinda A Henry; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.

Authors:  James Shehorn; Nicole Marrone; Thomas Muller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Cognitive Abilities Contribute to Spectro-Temporal Discrimination in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  Benjamin J Kirby; Meredith Spratford; Kelsey E Klein; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm.

Authors:  Susan Scollie; Richard Seewald; Leonard Cornelisse; Sheila Moodie; Marlene Bagatto; Diana Laurnagaray; Steve Beaulac; John Pumford
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

5.  High-frequency audibility: the effects of audiometric configuration, stimulus type, and device.

Authors:  Chelsea Kimlinger; Ryan McCreery; Dawna Lewis
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Benefit from, and acclimatization to, frequency compression hearing aids in experienced adult hearing-aid users.

Authors:  Rachel J Ellis; Kevin J Munro
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Prevalence of hearing loss and differences by demographic characteristics among US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Yuri Agrawal; Elizabeth A Platz; John K Niparko
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-28

8.  Effects of expansion on consonant recognition and consonant audibility.

Authors:  Marc Brennan; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Listening Effort and Speech Recognition with Frequency Compression Amplification for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Dawna Lewis; Ryan McCreery; Judy Kopun; Joshua M Alexander
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Masking Release in Children and Adults With Hearing Loss When Using Amplification.

Authors:  Marc Brennan; Ryan McCreery; Judy Kopun; Dawna Lewis; Joshua Alexander; Patricia Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.