Literature DB >> 19924408

Identifying the control of physically and perceptually evoked sway responses with coincident visual scene velocities and tilt of the base of support.

Yun Wang1, Robert V Kenyon, Emily A Keshner.   

Abstract

In this study, we have explored whether the impact of visual information on postural reactions is due to the same perceptual mechanisms that produce vection. Pitch motion of the visual field was presented at varying velocities to eight healthy subjects (29.9+/-2.8 years) standing quietly on a stationary base of support or receiving a 3 degrees toes-up tilt of the base of support. An infrared motion system recorded markers placed on body segments to record angular displacement of head and ankle and calculate whole body center of mass. Onset of the visual field motion and base of support movement were synchronized in all trials. We found that in the first 2 s following onset of visual field motion, both direction and amplitude of the linear displacement of whole body center of mass and angular displacement of the head, hip, and ankle were modulated by the velocity of visual scene motion. When the visual scene rotated in upward pitch, subjects overshot their initial vertical position with amplitudes that increased as velocity of the visual field increased. This behavior was even more evident when the base of support was tilted. These responses were much shorter than those observed in studies of vection. The dependence of the postural response amplitudes on the velocity of the visual field suggests, however, that there might be well-shared control pathways for visual influences on postural reactions and postural sway elicited by an illusion of self-motion.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19924408     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2082-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  40 in total

1.  Postural adjustment response to depth direction moving patterns produced by virtual reality graphics.

Authors:  S Kuno; T Kawakita; O Kawakami; Y Miyake; S Watanabe
Journal:  Jpn J Physiol       Date:  1999-10

2.  Differential effects of vestibular stimulation on walking and running.

Authors:  K Jahn; M Strupp; E Schneider; M Dieterich; T Brandt
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-06-05       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Adaptation of postural orientation to changes in surface inclination.

Authors:  Joann Kluzik; Robert J Peterka; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Characterizing head motion in three planes during combined visual and base of support disturbances in healthy and visually sensitive subjects.

Authors:  E A Keshner; Y Dhaher
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Postural responses to simulated moving environments are not invariant for the direction of gaze.

Authors:  C C Gielen; W N van Asten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visual stimulation affects the perception of voluntary leg movements during walking.

Authors:  J R Lackner; P DiZio
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Temporal stability of the action-perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment.

Authors:  T M Dijkstra; G Schöner; C C Gielen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The effects of visual depth and eccentricity on manual bias, induced motion, and vection.

Authors:  F H Previc; M Donnelly
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 9.  The neural processing of 3-D visual information: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  F A Miles
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Neural correlates of visual-motion perception as object- or self-motion.

Authors:  Andreas Kleinschmidt; Kai V Thilo; Christian Büchel; Michael A Gresty; Adolfo M Bronstein; Richard S J Frackowiak
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  8 in total

1.  Muscle synergies underlying control of taking a step during support surface translation.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Kazuhiko Watanabe; Tadayoshi Asaka; Lars Nybo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Influence of Visual Dependence on Inter-Segmental Coordination during Upright Stance in Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Yawen Yu; Carole A Tucker; Richard T Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Time series analysis of postural responses to combined visual pitch and support surface tilt.

Authors:  Jill C Slaboda; Richard Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Continuous visual field motion impacts the postural responses of older and younger women during and after support surface tilt.

Authors:  Jill C Slaboda; Richard T Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Reorientation to vertical modulated by combined support surface tilt and virtual visual flow in healthy elders and adults with stroke.

Authors:  Jill C Slaboda; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Combined effects of auditory and visual cues on the perception of vection.

Authors:  Behrang Keshavarz; Lawrence J Hettinger; Daniel Vena; Jennifer L Campos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visual dependence affects postural sway responses to continuous visual field motion in individuals with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Yawen Yu; Richard T Lauer; Carole A Tucker; Elizabeth D Thompson; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Dev Neurorehabil       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.308

8.  Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related?

Authors:  Behrang Keshavarz; Bernhard E Riecke; Lawrence J Hettinger; Jennifer L Campos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.