Literature DB >> 21479659

Continuous visual field motion impacts the postural responses of older and younger women during and after support surface tilt.

Jill C Slaboda1, Richard T Lauer, Emily A Keshner.   

Abstract

The effect of continuous visual flow on the ability to regain and maintain postural orientation was examined. Fourteen young (20-39 years old) and 14 older women (60-79 years old) stood quietly during 3° (30°/s) dorsiflexion tilt of the support surface combined with 30° and 45°/s upward or downward pitch rotations of the visual field. The support surface was held tilted for 30 s and then returned to neutral over a 30-s period while the visual field continued to rotate. Segmental displacement and bilateral tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius muscle EMG responses were recorded. Continuous wavelet transforms were calculated for each muscle EMG response. An instantaneous mean frequency curve (IMNF) of muscle activity, center of mass (COM), center of pressure (COP), and angular excursion at the hip and ankle were used in a functional principal component analysis (fPCA). Functional component weights were calculated and compared with mixed model repeated measures ANOVAs. The fPCA revealed greatest mathematical differences in COM and COP responses between groups or conditions during the period that the platform transitioned from the sustained tilt to a return to neutral position. Muscle EMG responses differed most in the period following support surface tilt indicating that muscle activity increased to support stabilization against the visual flow. Older women exhibited significantly larger COM and COP responses in the direction of visual field motion and less muscle modulation when the platform returned to neutral than younger women. Results on a Rod and Frame test indicated that older women were significantly more visually dependent than the younger women. We concluded that a stiffer body combined with heightened visual sensitivity in older women critically interferes with their ability to counteract posturally destabilizing environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21479659      PMCID: PMC3103060          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2655-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  59 in total

1.  Interaction between different sensory cues in the control of human gait.

Authors:  Elodie Varraine; Mireille Bonnard; Jean Pailhous
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy.

Authors:  Paul L Gribble; Lucy I Mullin; Nicholas Cothros; Andrew Mattar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Age-dependent variations in the directional sensitivity of balance corrections and compensatory arm movements in man.

Authors:  J H J Allum; M G Carpenter; F Honegger; A L Adkin; B R Bloem
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Adaptation of postural orientation to changes in surface inclination.

Authors:  Joann Kluzik; Robert J Peterka; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Association between ankle muscle strength and limit of stability in older adults.

Authors:  Itshak Melzer; Nissim Benjuya; Jacob Kaplanski; Neil Alexander
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 10.668

6.  Studies in space orientation; perception of the upright in the absence of a visual field.

Authors:  H A WITKIN; S E ASCH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-10

Review 7.  Age-related changes in posture and movement.

Authors:  M H Woollacott
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1993-09

8.  Anticipatory postural adjustments in older adults: are changes in response characteristics due to changes in strategy?

Authors:  M H Woollacott; D L Manchester
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1993-03

9.  Human stance control beyond steady state response and inverted pendulum simplification.

Authors:  G Schweigart; T Mergner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Aging and selective sensorimotor strategies in the regulation of upright balance.

Authors:  Nicoleta Bugnariu; Joyce Fung
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  10 in total

1.  Influence of Visual Dependence on Inter-Segmental Coordination during Upright Stance in Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Yawen Yu; Carole A Tucker; Richard T Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Sensorimotor and cognitive factors associated with the age-related increase of visual field dependence: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catherine P Agathos; Delphine Bernardin; Delphine Huchet; Anne-Catherine Scherlen; Christine Assaiante; Brice Isableu
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-06-30

3.  Young and Older Adults Differ in Integration of Sensory Cues for Vertical Perception.

Authors:  Rima Abdul Razzak; Jeff Bagust; Sharon Docherty
Journal:  J Aging Res       Date:  2020-07-31

4.  The effect of the type of foam pad used in the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (mCTSIB) on the accuracy in identifying older adults with fall history.

Authors:  Rumpa Boonsinsukh; Bodin Khumnonchai; Vitoon Saengsirisuwan; Nithinun Chaikeeree
Journal:  Hong Kong Physiother J       Date:  2020-07-25

5.  Reorientation to vertical modulated by combined support surface tilt and virtual visual flow in healthy elders and adults with stroke.

Authors:  Jill C Slaboda; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Visual dependence affects postural sway responses to continuous visual field motion in individuals with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Yawen Yu; Richard T Lauer; Carole A Tucker; Elizabeth D Thompson; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Dev Neurorehabil       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.308

7.  Visual conflict and cognitive load modify postural responses to vibrotactile noise.

Authors:  Emily A Keshner; Jill C Slaboda; Lois Lanaria Day; Kurosh Darvish
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Head Stability and Head-Trunk Coordination in Horseback Riders: The Contribution of Visual Information According to Expertise.

Authors:  Agnès Olivier; Elise Faugloire; Laure Lejeune; Sophie Biau; Brice Isableu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Individuals with cerebral palsy show altered responses to visual perturbations during walking.

Authors:  Ashwini Sansare; Maelyn Arcodia; Samuel C K Lee; John Jeka; Hendrik Reimann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.473

10.  Regularity of Center of Pressure Trajectories in Expert Gymnasts during Bipedal Closed-Eyes Quiet Standing.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Petra Hlavackova; Bruno Diot; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.