Literature DB >> 21238543

Time series analysis of postural responses to combined visual pitch and support surface tilt.

Jill C Slaboda1, Richard Lauer, Emily A Keshner.   

Abstract

The purpose of using time-series analyses is to provide interpretation of information on curves or functions, such as dynamic, biomechanical data. We evaluated the application of one method of time-series analysis for assessing changes in postural responses when exposed to a continuously rotating visual field combined with a tilted support surface. Functional Principal Component Analysis (fPCA) was applied to center of mass (CoM) trajectories collected from 22 young adults (20-39 y.o.) on a fixed surface or following a 3 degree (30°/s) dorsiflexion tilt of the support surface combined with continuous upward or downward pitch rotation of the visual field at 30 and 45°/s. The usefulness of this analytical tool is that each curve is treated as a distinct observation by itself, allowing for traditional PCA to be applied to the analysis of curves. Results of the fPCA highlighted 5 distinct time periods in the CoM curves that explained 91% of the variability in the data. These periods in which the young adults altered their CoM in response to visual field motion would not have been identified if we had relied on the onset and offset of the transient disturbance to distinguish responses. Young adults significantly displaced their CoM in response to visual motion over both the period of support surface tilt and while the support surface returned to a neutral position. Our results indicate that fPCA is a viable method when applied to the small but complex changes that emerge in postural data and might allow for a better understanding of time dependent processes occurring with pathology and intervention.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21238543      PMCID: PMC3044913          DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  33 in total

1.  Analysis and modeling of human postural control.

Authors:  Patrick Loughlin; Mark Redfern
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

2.  Postural responses triggered by multidirectional leg lifts and surface tilts.

Authors:  Lucinda K Hughey; Joyce Fung
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A portable audio-biofeedback system to improve postural control.

Authors:  M Dozza; L Chiari; F B Horak
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

4.  Characterizing head motion in three planes during combined visual and base of support disturbances in healthy and visually sensitive subjects.

Authors:  E A Keshner; Y Dhaher
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Dynamics of the sit-to-stand movement.

Authors:  P D Roberts; G McCollum
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Postural coactivation and adaptation in the sway stabilizing responses of normals and patients with bilateral vestibular deficit.

Authors:  E A Keshner; J H Allum; C R Pfaltz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visual contribution to rapid motor responses during postural control.

Authors:  L Nashner; A Berthoz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Visual motion combined with base of support width reveals variable field dependency in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Jefferson W Streepey; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance: patients with vestibular deficits.

Authors:  L M Nashner; F O Black; C Wall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Effects of roll visual motion on online control of arm movement: reaching within a dynamic virtual environment.

Authors:  Assaf Y Dvorkin; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparing the effects of mechanical perturbation training with a compliant surface and manual perturbation training on joints kinematics after ACL-rupture.

Authors:  Zakariya Nawasreh; Mathew Failla; Adam Marmon; David Logerstedt; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Continuous visual field motion impacts the postural responses of older and younger women during and after support surface tilt.

Authors:  Jill C Slaboda; Richard T Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Reorientation to vertical modulated by combined support surface tilt and virtual visual flow in healthy elders and adults with stroke.

Authors:  Jill C Slaboda; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  No difference between mechanical perturbation training with compliant surface and manual perturbation training on knee functional performance after ACL rupture.

Authors:  Zakariya Nawasreh; David Logerstedt; Mathew Failla; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Regularity of Center of Pressure Trajectories in Expert Gymnasts during Bipedal Closed-Eyes Quiet Standing.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Petra Hlavackova; Bruno Diot; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.