Literature DB >> 12202076

Neural correlates of visual-motion perception as object- or self-motion.

Andreas Kleinschmidt1, Kai V Thilo, Christian Büchel, Michael A Gresty, Adolfo M Bronstein, Richard S J Frackowiak.   

Abstract

Both self-motion and objects moving in our visual field generate visual motion by displacing images on the retina. Resolving this ambiguity may seem effortless but large-field visual-motion stimuli can yield perceptual rivalry between the real percept of object-motion and the illusory percept of self-motion (vection). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to record brain activity in human observers exposed to constant-velocity roll-motion. This stimulus induced responses in areas reaching from calcarine to parieto-occipital and to ventral and lateral temporo-occipital cortex and the anterior insula. During vection, early motion-sensitive visual areas and vestibular parieto-insular cortex deactivated, whereas higher-order parieto- and temporo-occipital areas known to respond to optical flow retained identical activity levels. Within this sustained response, these latter areas displayed transient activations in response to each perceptual switch as identified in event-related analyses. Our results thus show that these areas are responsive to the type of visual motion stimulus and highly sensitive to its perceptual bistability. The only region to be more active during perceived self-motion was in, or close to, the cerebellar nodulus. This activation may correspond to the gain increase of torsional optokinetic nystagmus during vection and/or to changes in sensory processing related to the rotational percept. In conclusion, we identified neural correlates of perceiving self-motion from vision alone, i.e., in the absence of confirmatory vestibular or proprioceptive input. These functional properties preserve the organism's ability to move accurately in its environment by relying on visual cues under conditions when the other spatial senses fail to provide such information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12202076     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  68 in total

1.  Rollvection versus linearvection: comparison of brain activations in PET.

Authors:  Angela Deutschländer; Sandra Bense; Thomas Stephan; Markus Schwaiger; Marianne Dieterich; Thomas Brandt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Vection can be induced in the absence of explicit motion stimuli.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Hiroyuki Ito; Shoji Sunaga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Variability of perceptual multistability: from brain state to individual trait.

Authors:  Andreas Kleinschmidt; Philipp Sterzer; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Neural correlates of the continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion: a functional MRI study.

Authors:  Leila Reddy; Florence Rémy; Nathalie Vayssière; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Sustained cortical and subcortical neuromodulation induced by electrical tongue stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph C Wildenberg; Mitchell E Tyler; Yuri P Danilov; Kurt A Kaczmarek; Mary E Meyerand
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.978

6.  Visual Attention Modulates Glutamate-Glutamine Levels in Vestibular Cortex: Evidence from Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Sebastian M Frank; Lisa Forster; Maja Pawellek; Wilhelm M Malloni; Sinyeob Ahn; Peter U Tse; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  A neural basis for inference in perceptual ambiguity.

Authors:  Philipp Sterzer; Andreas Kleinschmidt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The perception of motion smear during eye and head movements.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Jianliang Tong; Murat Aydin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The role of attention on the integration of visual and inertial cues.

Authors:  Daniel R Berger; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Deriving angular displacement from optic flow: a fMRI study.

Authors:  Volker Diekmann; Reinhart Jürgens; Wolfgang Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.