Literature DB >> 24306440

Combined effects of auditory and visual cues on the perception of vection.

Behrang Keshavarz1, Lawrence J Hettinger, Daniel Vena, Jennifer L Campos.   

Abstract

Vection is the illusion of self-motion in the absence of real physical movement. The aim of the present study was to analyze how multisensory inputs (visual and auditory) contribute to the perception of vection. Participants were seated in a stationary position in front of a large, curved projection display and were exposed to a virtual scene that constantly rotated around the yaw-axis, simulating a 360° rotation. The virtual scene contained either only visual, only auditory, or a combination of visual and auditory cues. Additionally, simulated rotation speed (90°/s vs. 60°/s) and the number of sound sources (1 vs. 3) were varied for all three stimulus conditions. All participants were exposed to every condition in a randomized order. Data specific to vection latency, vection strength, the severity of motion sickness (MS), and postural steadiness were collected. Results revealed reduced vection onset latencies and increased vection strength when auditory cues were added to the visual stimuli, whereas MS and postural steadiness were not affected by the presence of auditory cues. Half of the participants reported experiencing auditorily induced vection, although the sensation was rather weak and less robust than visually induced vection. Results demonstrate that the combination of visual and auditory cues can enhance the sensation of vection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24306440     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3793-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Vection and simulator sickness.

Authors:  L J Hettinger; K S Berbaum; R S Kennedy; W P Dunlap; M D Nolan
Journal:  Mil Psychol       Date:  1990

2.  Optokinetic stimuli: motion sickness, visual acuity, and eye movements.

Authors:  Nicholas A Webb; Michael J Griffin
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2002-04

3.  Multisensory integration in speed estimation during self-motion.

Authors:  Hong-Jin Sun; Amanda J Lee; Jennifer L Campos; George S W Chan; Da-Hui Zhang
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2003-10

4.  Effects of simulated viewpoint jitter on visually induced postural sway.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Gavin J Pinniger; April Ash; Julie R Steele
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 5.  Auditorily-induced illusory self-motion: a review.

Authors:  Aleksander Väljamäe
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2009-07-18

6.  Validating an efficient method to quantify motion sickness.

Authors:  Behrang Keshavarz; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.888

7.  Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes.

Authors:  F Lestienne; J Soechting; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1977-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Isolating the effects of vection and optokinetic nystagmus on optokinetic rotation-induced motion sickness.

Authors:  Jennifer T T Ji; Richard H Y So; Raymond T F Cheung
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.888

9.  Visually induced motion sickness predicted by postural instability.

Authors:  L James Smart; Thomas A Stoffregen; Benoît G Bardy
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.888

10.  Objective fidelity evaluation in multisensory virtual environments: auditory cue fidelity in flight simulation.

Authors:  Georg F Meyer; Li Ting Wong; Emma Timson; Philip Perfect; Mark D White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  18 in total

1.  Optokinetic circular vection: a test of visual-vestibular conflict models of vection nascensy.

Authors:  R Jürgens; K Kliegl; J Kassubek; W Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The Shepard-Risset glissando: music that moves you.

Authors:  Rebecca A Mursic; Bernhard E Riecke; Deborah Apthorp; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Podokinetic circular vection: characteristics and interaction with optokinetic circular vection.

Authors:  W Becker; K Kliegl; J Kassubek; R Jürgens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Perceptual Postural Imbalance and Visual Vertigo.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Hebert; Prem S Subramanian
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Effects of auditory information on self-motion perception during simultaneous presentation of visual shearing motion.

Authors:  Shigehito Tanahashi; Kaoru Ashihara; Hiroyasu Ujike
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-11

6.  Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related?

Authors:  Behrang Keshavarz; Bernhard E Riecke; Lawrence J Hettinger; Jennifer L Campos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-20

7.  Demonstrating the potential for dynamic auditory stimulation to contribute to motion sickness.

Authors:  Behrang Keshavarz; Lawrence J Hettinger; Robert S Kennedy; Jennifer L Campos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of stereopsis on vection, presence and cybersickness in head-mounted display (HMD) virtual reality.

Authors:  Wilson Luu; Barbara Zangerl; Michael Kalloniatis; Juno Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Human Vection Perception Using Inertial Nulling and Certainty Estimation: The Effect of Migraine History.

Authors:  Mark A Miller; Catherine J O'Leary; Paul D Allen; Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The Use of Virtual Reality in Psychology: A Case Study in Visual Perception.

Authors:  Christopher J Wilson; Alessandro Soranzo
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.