Literature DB >> 18162402

Characterizing head motion in three planes during combined visual and base of support disturbances in healthy and visually sensitive subjects.

E A Keshner1, Y Dhaher.   

Abstract

Multiplanar environmental motion could generate head instability, particularly if the visual surround moves in planes orthogonal to a physical disturbance. We combined sagittal plane surface translations with visual field disturbances in 12 healthy (29-31 years) and 3 visually sensitive (27-57 years) adults. Center of pressure (COP), peak head angles, and RMS values of head motion were calculated and a three-dimensional model of joint motion was developed to examine gross head motion in three planes. We found that subjects standing quietly in front of a visual scene translating in the sagittal plane produced significantly greater (p<0.003) head motion in yaw than when on a translating platform. However, when the platform was translated in the dark or with a visual scene rotating in roll, head motion orthogonal to the plane of platform motion significantly increased (p<0.02). Visually sensitive subjects having no history of vestibular disorder produced large, delayed compensatory head motion. Orthogonal head motions were significantly greater in visually sensitive than in healthy subjects in the dark (p<0.05) and with a stationary scene (p<0.01). We concluded that motion of the visual field could modify compensatory response kinematics of a freely moving head in planes orthogonal to the direction of a physical perturbation. These results suggest that the mechanisms controlling head orientation in space are distinct from those that control trunk orientation in space. These behaviors would have been missed if only COP data were considered. Data suggest that rehabilitation training can be enhanced by combining visual and mechanical perturbation paradigms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18162402      PMCID: PMC2577851          DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  29 in total

1.  Three-dimensional head and upper arm orientations during kinematically redundant movements and at rest.

Authors:  M A Admiraal; W P Medendorp; C C A M Gielen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The influence of an immersive virtual environment on the segmental organization of postural stabilizing responses.

Authors:  E A Keshner; R V Kenyon
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Head-trunk coordination during linear anterior-posterior translations.

Authors:  Emily A Keshner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Sensory vestibular contributions to constructing internal models of self-motion.

Authors:  Andrea M Green; Aasef G Shaikh; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Influences of the perception of self-motion on postural parameters.

Authors:  E A Keshner; K Dokka; R V Kenyon
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2006-04

6.  An internal model of head kinematics predicts the influence of head orientation on reflexive eye movements.

Authors:  L H Zupan; D M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Instantaneous rotation axes during active head movements.

Authors:  Steven T Moore; Eishi Hirasaki; Theodore Raphan; Bernard Cohen
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI.

Authors:  B Dobkin; D Apple; H Barbeau; M Basso; A Behrman; D Deforge; J Ditunno; G Dudley; R Elashoff; L Fugate; S Harkema; M Saulino; M Scott
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  A Bayesian model of the disambiguation of gravitoinertial force by visual cues.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Martin S Banks; Daniel R Berger; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Pairing virtual reality with dynamic posturography serves to differentiate between patients experiencing visual vertigo.

Authors:  Emily A Keshner; Jefferson Streepey; Yasin Dhaher; Timothy Hain
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  8 in total

1.  Identifying the control of physically and perceptually evoked sway responses with coincident visual scene velocities and tilt of the base of support.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Time series analysis of postural responses to combined visual pitch and support surface tilt.

Authors:  Jill C Slaboda; Richard Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Differential integration of visual and kinaesthetic signals to upright stance.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Benoît Fourre; Nicolas Vuillerme; Guillaume Giraudet; Michel-Ange Amorim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Continuous visual field motion impacts the postural responses of older and younger women during and after support surface tilt.

Authors:  Jill C Slaboda; Richard T Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Contribution of vision to postural behaviors during continuous support-surface translations.

Authors:  D Joseph Jilk; Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Changes in cerebral activation in individuals with and without visual vertigo during optic flow: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Carrie W Hoppes; Patrick J Sparto; Susan L Whitney; Joseph M Furman; Theodore J Huppert
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  Postural and Head Control Given Different Environmental Contexts.

Authors:  Anat V Lubetzky; Jennifer L Kelly; Bryan D Hujsak; Jenny Liu; Daphna Harel; Maura Cosetti
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Altered motor control patterns in whiplash and chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Astrid Woodhouse; Ottar Vasseljen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.