Literature DB >> 19922443

The genomic location of sexually antagonistic variation: some cautionary comments.

James D Fry1.   

Abstract

Sexually antagonistic polymorphisms are polymorphisms in which the allele that is advantageous in one sex is deleterious in the other sex. In an influential 1984 paper, W. Rice hypothesized that such polymorphisms should be relatively common on the X chromosome (or on the W in female-heterogametic species) but relatively rare on the autosomes. Here, I show that there are plausible assumptions under which the reverse is expected to be true, and point out recent studies that give evidence for sexually antagonistic variation on the autosomes. Although more work is needed to resolve the issue, it is premature to conclude that the X chromosome is a "hot spot" for the accumulation of sexually antagonistic variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19922443      PMCID: PMC3654548          DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00898.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  29 in total

1.  Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness.

Authors:  Kenneth M Fedorka; Timothy A Mousseau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Troy Day; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Within-clutch variation in offspring sex determined by differences in sire body size: cryptic mate choice in the wild.

Authors:  Ryan Calsbeek; Barry Sinervo
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Genetic and environmental effects on secondary sex traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  K A Hughes; F H Rodd; D N Reznick
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Sexual selection can resolve sex-linked sexual antagonism.

Authors:  Arianne Y K Albert; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Evolution on the X chromosome: unusual patterns and processes.

Authors:  Beatriz Vicoso; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Genetic models of homosexuality: generating testable predictions.

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets; William R Rice
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation.

Authors:  Jonathan R Gibson; Adam K Chippindale; William R Rice
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Extreme polymorphism in a Y-linked sexually selected trait.

Authors:  A K Lindholm; R Brooks; F Breden
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila.

Authors:  A K Chippindale; J R Gibson; W R Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  67 in total

Review 1.  Gene duplication, tissue-specific gene expression and sexual conflict in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae).

Authors:  Richard H Baker; Apurva Narechania; Philip M Johns; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Sex-dependent dominance maintains migration supergene in rainbow trout.

Authors:  Devon E Pearse; Nicola J Barson; Torfinn Nome; Guangtu Gao; Matthew A Campbell; Alicia Abadía-Cardoso; Eric C Anderson; David E Rundio; Thomas H Williams; Kerry A Naish; Thomas Moen; Sixin Liu; Matthew Kent; Michel Moser; David R Minkley; Eric B Rondeau; Marine S O Brieuc; Simen Rød Sandve; Michael R Miller; Lucydalila Cedillo; Kobi Baruch; Alvaro G Hernandez; Gil Ben-Zvi; Doron Shem-Tov; Omer Barad; Kirill Kuzishchin; John Carlos Garza; Steven T Lindley; Ben F Koop; Gary H Thorgaard; Yniv Palti; Sigbjørn Lien
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Sex linkage, sex-specific selection, and the role of recombination in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Sexual and parental antagonism shape genomic architecture.

Authors:  Manus M Patten; Francisco Ubeda; David Haig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The resolution of sexual antagonism by gene duplication.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Sex-biased gene expression and sexual conflict throughout development.

Authors:  Fiona C Ingleby; Ilona Flis; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 10.005

7.  Sexual antagonism drives the displacement of polymorphism across gene regulatory cascades.

Authors:  Mark S Hill; Max Reuter; Alexander J Stewart
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Impact of deleterious mutations, sexually antagonistic selection, and mode of recombination suppression on transitions between male and female heterogamety.

Authors:  Paul A Saunders; Samuel Neuenschwander; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  The Relative Contributions of the X Chromosome and Autosomes to Local Adaptation.

Authors:  Clémentine Lasne; Carla M Sgrò; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Signatures of sex-antagonistic selection on recombining sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Rafael F Guerrero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.