Literature DB >> 24026821

Sexual and parental antagonism shape genomic architecture.

Manus M Patten1, Francisco Ubeda, David Haig.   

Abstract

Populations with two sexes are vulnerable to a pair of genetic conflicts: sexual antagonism that can arise when alleles have opposing fitness effects on females and males; and parental antagonism that arises when alleles have opposing fitness effects when maternally and paternally inherited. This paper extends previous theoretical work that found stable linkage disequilibrium (LD) between sexually antagonistic loci. We find that LD is also generated between parentally antagonistic loci, and between sexually and parentally antagonistic loci, without any requirement of epistasis. We contend that the LD in these models arises from the admixture of gene pools subject to different selective histories. We also find that polymorphism maintained by parental antagonism at one locus expands the opportunity for polymorphism at a linked locus experiencing parental or sexual antagonism. Taken together, our results predict the chromosomal clustering of loci that segregate for sexually and parentally antagonistic alleles. Thus, genetic conflict may play a role in the evolution of genomic architecture.

Keywords:  linkage disequilibrium; parental antagonism; sexual antagonism

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24026821      PMCID: PMC3779332          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  23 in total

1.  Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Troy Day; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Sex-specific meiotic drive and selection at an imprinted locus.

Authors:  Francisco Ubeda; David Haig
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Scrambling eggs: meiotic drive and the evolution of female recombination rates.

Authors:  Yaniv Brandvain; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Fitness variation due to sexual antagonism and linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Manus M Patten; David Haig; Francisco Ubeda
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Intralocus sexual conflict.

Authors:  Russell Bonduriansky; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 6.  Intralocus sexual conflict.

Authors:  G Sander van Doorn
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Linkage disequilibrium in subdivided populations.

Authors:  M Nei; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Owen's model of a genetical system with differential viability between sexes.

Authors:  S P Mandel
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  The genomic location of sexually antagonistic variation: some cautionary comments.

Authors:  James D Fry
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Recombination difference between sexes: a role for haploid selection.

Authors:  Thomas Lenormand; Julien Dutheil
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Florence Débarre; Xiang-Yi Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Specialists and generalists: the sexual ecology of the genome.

Authors:  David Haig; Francisco Úbeda; Manus M Patten
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Balancing selection in species with separate sexes: insights from Fisher's geometric model.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Genomic conflicts and sexual antagonism in human health: insights from oxytocin and testosterone.

Authors:  Mikael Mokkonen; Bernard J Crespi
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Accumulation of Deleterious Mutations Near Sexually Antagonistic Genes.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Crispin Y Jordan
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Biparental contributions of the H2A.B histone variant control embryonic development in mice.

Authors:  Antoine Molaro; Anna J Wood; Derek Janssens; Selina M Kindelay; Michael T Eickbush; Steven Wu; Priti Singh; Charles H Muller; Steven Henikoff; Harmit S Malik
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 8.029

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.