Literature DB >> 20874735

Sex linkage, sex-specific selection, and the role of recombination in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression.

Tim Connallon1, Andrew G Clark.   

Abstract

Sex-biased genes--genes that are differentially expressed within males and females--are nonrandomly distributed across animal genomes, with sex chromosomes and autosomes often carrying markedly different concentrations of male- and female-biased genes. These linkage patterns are often gene- and lineage-dependent, differing between functional genetic categories and between species. Although sex-specific selection is often hypothesized to shape the evolution of sex-linked and autosomal gene content, population genetics theory has yet to account for many of the gene- and lineage-specific idiosyncrasies emerging from the empirical literature. With the goal of improving the connection between evolutionary theory and a rapidly growing body of genome-wide empirical studies, we extend previous population genetics theory of sex-specific selection by developing and analyzing a biologically informed model that incorporates sex linkage, pleiotropy, recombination, and epistasis, factors that are likely to vary between genes and between species. Our results demonstrate that sex-specific selection and sex-specific recombination rates can generate, and are compatible with, the gene- and species-specific linkage patterns reported in the genomics literature. The theory suggests that sexual selection may strongly influence the architectures of animal genomes, as well as the chromosomal distribution of fixed substitutions underlying sexually dimorphic traits.
© 2010 The Author(s). Evolution© 2010 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20874735      PMCID: PMC2998557          DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01136.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  133 in total

1.  Sex-limited mutations and the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  T Rhen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Sexual antagonism and X inactivation--the SAXI hypothesis.

Authors:  Chung I Wu; Eugene Yujun Xu
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Sebida: a database for the functional and evolutionary analysis of genes with sex-biased expression.

Authors:  Florian Gnad; John Parsch
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-31       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Demasculinization of X chromosomes in the Drosophila genus.

Authors:  David Sturgill; Yu Zhang; Michael Parisi; Brian Oliver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The relationship among gene expression, the evolution of gene dosage, and the rate of protein evolution.

Authors:  Jean-François Gout; Daniel Kahn; Laurent Duret
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 6.  Gene content evolution on the X chromosome.

Authors:  Tatiana A Gurbich; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 5.578

7.  Paucity of genes on the Drosophila X chromosome showing male-biased expression.

Authors:  Michael Parisi; Rachel Nuttall; Daniel Naiman; Gerard Bouffard; James Malley; Justen Andrews; Scott Eastman; Brian Oliver
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The mouse X chromosome is enriched for multicopy testis genes showing postmeiotic expression.

Authors:  Jacob L Mueller; Shantha K Mahadevaiah; Peter J Park; Peter E Warburton; David C Page; James M A Turner
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-05-04       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Non-coding changes cause sex-specific wing size differences between closely related species of Nasonia.

Authors:  David W Loehlin; Deodoro C S G Oliveira; Rachel Edwards; Jonathan D Giebel; Michael E Clark; M Victoria Cattani; Louis van de Zande; Eveline C Verhulst; Leo W Beukeboom; Monica Muñoz-Torres; John H Werren
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Gene expression during the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Michelle N Arbeitman; Eileen E M Furlong; Farhad Imam; Eric Johnson; Brian H Null; Bruce S Baker; Mark A Krasnow; Matthew P Scott; Ronald W Davis; Kevin P White
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  59 in total

1.  The resolution of sexual antagonism by gene duplication.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Is sexual conflict an "engine of speciation"?

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Genetic constraints on microevolutionary divergence of sex-biased gene expression.

Authors:  Scott L Allen; Russell Bonduriansky; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Trade-off between selection for dosage compensation and masculinization on the avian Z chromosome.

Authors:  Alison E Wright; Hooman K Moghadam; Judith E Mank
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genomic imprinting leads to less selectively maintained polymorphism on X chromosomes.

Authors:  Anna W Santure; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Signatures of sex-antagonistic selection on recombining sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Rafael F Guerrero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Balancing selection in species with separate sexes: insights from Fisher's geometric model.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Sexually antagonistic polymorphism in simultaneous hermaphrodites.

Authors:  Crispin Y Jordan; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 9.  Spermatogenesis and the Evolution of Mammalian Sex Chromosomes.

Authors:  Erica L Larson; Emily E K Kopania; Jeffrey M Good
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  Matrilineal inheritance of a key mediator of prenatal maternal effects.

Authors:  Barbara Tschirren; Ann-Kathrin Ziegler; Joel L Pick; Monika Okuliarová; Michal Zeman; Mathieu Giraudeau
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.