Literature DB >> 31161912

Sexual antagonism drives the displacement of polymorphism across gene regulatory cascades.

Mark S Hill1,2, Max Reuter2, Alexander J Stewart3.   

Abstract

Males and females have different reproductive roles and are often subject to contrasting selection pressures. This sexual antagonism can lead, at a given locus, to different alleles being favoured in each sex and, consequently, to genetic variation being maintained in a population. Although the presence of sexually antagonistic (SA) polymorphisms has been documented across a range of species, their evolutionary dynamics remain poorly understood. Here, we study SA selection on gene expression, which is fundamental to sexual dimorphism, via the evolution of regulatory binding sites. We show that for sites longer than 1 nucleotide, expression polymorphism is maintained only when intermediate expression levels are deleterious to both sexes. We then show that, in a regulatory cascade, expression polymorphism tends to become displaced over evolutionary time from the target of SA selection to upstream regulators. Our results have consequences for understanding the evolution of sexual dimorphism, and provide specific empirical predictions for the regulatory architecture of genes under SA selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binding site; gene regulation; regulatory cascade; sexual antagonism; transcription factor

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31161912      PMCID: PMC6571454          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  52 in total

1.  On the selection and evolution of regulatory DNA motifs.

Authors:  Ulrich Gerland; Terence Hwa
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION.

Authors:  M KIMURA; J F CROW
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Contrasting effects of intralocus sexual conflict on sexually antagonistic coevolution.

Authors:  Tanya M Pennell; Freek J H de Haas; Edward H Morrow; G Sander van Doorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Intralocus sexual conflict over immune defense, gender load, and sex-specific signaling in a natural lizard population.

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Andrew G McAdam; Barry Sinervo
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  SEX CHROMOSOMES AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM.

Authors:  William R Rice
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Intralocus sexual conflict over wing length in a wild migratory bird.

Authors:  Maja Tarka; Mikael Akesson; Dennis Hasselquist; Bengt Hansson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Sex-biased gene expression, sexual antagonism and levels of genetic diversity in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis) genome.

Authors:  Ludovic Dutoit; Carina F Mugal; Paulina Bolívar; Mi Wang; Krystyna Nadachowska-Brzyska; Linnéa Smeds; Homa P Yazdi; Lars Gustafsson; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Evolution of alternative transcriptional circuits with identical logic.

Authors:  Annie E Tsong; Brian B Tuch; Hao Li; Alexander D Johnson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Negative frequency-dependent selection of sexually antagonistic alleles in Myodes glareolus.

Authors:  Mikael Mokkonen; Hanna Kokko; Esa Koskela; Jussi Lehtonen; Tapio Mappes; Henna Martiskainen; Suzanne C Mills
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Genome-wide sexually antagonistic variants reveal long-standing constraints on sexual dimorphism in fruit flies.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Mark S Hill; Tanya M Pennell; Ilona Flis; Fiona C Ingleby; Richard Mott; Kevin Fowler; Edward H Morrow; Max Reuter
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  2 in total

1.  Genome-wide interaction analysis identified low-frequency variants with sex disparity in lung cancer risk.

Authors:  Yafang Li; Xiangjun Xiao; Jianrong Li; Jinyoung Byun; Chao Cheng; Yohan Bossé; James McKay; Demetrios Albanes; Stephen Lam; Adonina Tardon; Chu Chen; Stig E Bojesen; Maria T Landi; Mattias Johansson; Angela Risch; Heike Bickeböller; H-Erich Wichmann; David C Christiani; Gad Rennert; Susanne Arnold; Gary Goodman; John K Field; Michael P A Davies; Sanjay S Shete; Loic Le Marchand; Olle Melander; Hans Brunnström; Geoffrey Liu; Rayjean J Hung; Angeline S Andrew; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Hongbing Shen; Ryan Sun; Shan Zienolddiny; Kjell Grankvist; Mikael Johansson; Neil Caporaso; Dawn M Teare; Yun-Chul Hong; Philip Lazarus; Matthew B Schabath; Melinda C Aldrich; Ann G Schwartz; Ivan Gorlov; Kristen Purrington; Ping Yang; Yanhong Liu; Younghun Han; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Susan M Pinney; Diptasri Mandal; James C Willey; Colette Gaba; Paul Brennan; Christopher I Amos
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 5.121

2.  Is the X chromosome a hot spot for sexually antagonistic polymorphisms? Biases in current empirical tests of classical theory.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.