Literature DB >> 31028370

Impact of deleterious mutations, sexually antagonistic selection, and mode of recombination suppression on transitions between male and female heterogamety.

Paul A Saunders1, Samuel Neuenschwander2,3, Nicolas Perrin2.   

Abstract

Deleterious mutations accumulating on non-recombining Y chromosomes can drive XY to XY turnovers, as they allow to replace the old mutation-loaded Y by a new mutation-free one. The same process is thought to prevent XY to ZW turnovers, because the latter requires fixation of the ancestral Y, assuming dominance of the emergent feminizing mutation. Using individual-based simulations, we explored whether and how an epistatically dominant W allele can spread in a young XY system that gradually accumulates deleterious mutations. We also investigated how sexually antagonistic (SA) polymorphism on the ancestral sex chromosomes and the mechanism controlling X-Y recombination suppression affect these transitions. In contrast with XY to XY turnovers, XY to ZW turnovers cannot be favored by Y chromosome mutation load. If the arrest of X-Y recombination depends on genotypic sex, transitions are strongly hindered by deleterious mutations, and totally suppressed by very small SA cost, because deleterious mutations and female-detrimental SA alleles would have to fix with the Y. If, however, the arrest of X-Y recombination depends on phenotypic sex, X and Y recombine in XY ZW females, allowing for the purge of Y-linked deleterious mutations and loss of the SA polymorphism, causing XY to ZW turnovers to occur at the same rate as in the absence of deleterious and sex-antagonistic mutations. We generalize our results to other types of turnovers (e.g., triggered by non-dominant sex-determining mutations) and discuss their empirical relevance.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31028370      PMCID: PMC6781157          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-019-0225-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  40 in total

1.  The potential for sexually antagonistic polymorphism in different genome regions.

Authors:  Crispin Y Jordan; Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Transitions between male and female heterogamety caused by sex-antagonistic selection.

Authors:  G Sander van Doorn; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Sex chromosome evolution in non-mammalian vertebrates.

Authors:  Manfred Schartl
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 4.  Sex reversal: a fountain of youth for sex chromosomes?

Authors:  Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Restriction Site-Associated DNA Sequencing (RAD-seq) Reveals an Extraordinary Number of Transitions among Gecko Sex-Determining Systems.

Authors:  Tony Gamble; Jessi Coryell; Tariq Ezaz; Joshua Lynch; Daniel P Scantlebury; David Zarkower
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Sex Determination, Sex Chromosomes, and Karyotype Evolution in Insects.

Authors:  Heath Blackmon; Laura Ross; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  Changes in the heterogametic mechanism of sex determination.

Authors:  J J Bull; E L Charnov
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 8.  Why Do Sex Chromosomes Stop Recombining?

Authors:  Suvi Ponnikas; Hanna Sigeman; Jessica K Abbott; Bengt Hansson
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  Sex-Chromosome Recombination in Common Frogs Brings Water to the Fountain-of-Youth.

Authors:  Nicolas Rodrigues; Tania Studer; Christophe Dufresnes; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Transitions in sex determination and sex chromosomes across vertebrate species.

Authors:  Matthew W Pennell; Judith E Mank; Catherine L Peichel
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  5 in total

1.  A frog with three sex chromosomes that co-mingle together in nature: Xenopus tropicalis has a degenerate W and a Y that evolved from a Z chromosome.

Authors:  Benjamin L S Furman; Caroline M S Cauret; Martin Knytl; Xue-Ying Song; Tharindu Premachandra; Caleb Ofori-Boateng; Danielle C Jordan; Marko E Horb; Ben J Evans
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 5.917

2.  Establishment of a new sex-determining allele driven by sexually antagonistic selection.

Authors:  Takahiro Sakamoto; Hideki Innan
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  Repeated turnovers keep sex chromosomes young in willows.

Authors:  Deyan Wang; Yiling Li; Mengmeng Li; Wenlu Yang; Xinzhi Ma; Lei Zhang; Yubo Wang; Yanlin Feng; Yuanyuan Zhang; Ran Zhou; Brian J Sanderson; Ken Keefover-Ring; Tongming Yin; Lawrence B Smart; Stephen P DiFazio; Jianquan Liu; Matthew Olson; Tao Ma
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 17.906

4.  Sex chromosome degeneration, turnover, and sex-biased expression of sex-linked transcripts in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).

Authors:  Xue-Ying Song; Benjamin L S Furman; Tharindu Premachandra; Martin Knytl; Caroline M S Cauret; Domnick Victor Wasonga; John Measey; Ian Dworkin; Ben J Evans
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 6.671

5.  When Sex Chromosomes Recombine Only in the Heterogametic Sex: Heterochiasmy and Heterogamety in Hyla Tree Frogs.

Authors:  Christophe Dufresnes; Alan Brelsford; Felix Baier; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 16.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.