Literature DB >> 31768021

Sex-dependent dominance maintains migration supergene in rainbow trout.

Devon E Pearse1, Nicola J Barson2, Torfinn Nome2, Guangtu Gao3, Matthew A Campbell4, Alicia Abadía-Cardoso5, Eric C Anderson6, David E Rundio6, Thomas H Williams6, Kerry A Naish7, Thomas Moen8, Sixin Liu3, Matthew Kent2, Michel Moser2, David R Minkley9, Eric B Rondeau9, Marine S O Brieuc7, Simen Rød Sandve2, Michael R Miller10, Lucydalila Cedillo10, Kobi Baruch11, Alvaro G Hernandez12, Gil Ben-Zvi11, Doron Shem-Tov11, Omer Barad11, Kirill Kuzishchin13, John Carlos Garza6, Steven T Lindley6, Ben F Koop9, Gary H Thorgaard14, Yniv Palti15, Sigbjørn Lien16.   

Abstract

Males and females often differ in their fitness optima for shared traits that have a shared genetic basis, leading to sexual conflict. Morphologically differentiated sex chromosomes can resolve this conflict and protect sexually antagonistic variation, but they accumulate deleterious mutations. However, how sexual conflict is resolved in species that lack differentiated sex chromosomes is largely unknown. Here we present a chromosome-anchored genome assembly for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and characterize a 55-Mb double-inversion supergene that mediates sex-specific migratory tendency through sex-dependent dominance reversal, an alternative mechanism for resolving sexual conflict. The double inversion contains key photosensory, circadian rhythm, adiposity and sex-related genes and displays a latitudinal frequency cline, indicating environmentally dependent selection. Our results show sex-dependent dominance reversal across a large autosomal supergene, a mechanism for sexual conflict resolution capable of protecting sexually antagonistic variation while avoiding the homozygous lethality and deleterious mutations associated with typical heteromorphic sex chromosomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31768021     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-019-1044-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   15.460


  93 in total

1.  The geography of sex-specific selection, local adaptation, and sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Tim Connallon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  SEXUAL DIMORPHISM, SEXUAL SELECTION, AND ADAPTATION IN POLYGENIC CHARACTERS.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  THE ACCUMULATION OF SEXUALLY ANTAGONISTIC GENES AS A SELECTIVE AGENT PROMOTING THE EVOLUTION OF REDUCED RECOMBINATION BETWEEN PRIMITIVE SEX CHROMOSOMES.

Authors:  William R Rice
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  The Evolution of Sex-Specific Dominance in Response to Sexually Antagonistic Selection.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer; Nicholas K Priest
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Sex-antagonistic genes, XY recombination and feminized Y chromosomes.

Authors:  E Cavoto; S Neuenschwander; J Goudet; N Perrin
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 6.  Population genetics of sexual conflict in the genomic era.

Authors:  Judith E Mank
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  The genomic location of sexually antagonistic variation: some cautionary comments.

Authors:  James D Fry
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Sex-dependent dominance at a single locus maintains variation in age at maturity in salmon.

Authors:  Nicola J Barson; Tutku Aykanat; Kjetil Hindar; Matthew Baranski; Geir H Bolstad; Peder Fiske; Céleste Jacq; Arne J Jensen; Susan E Johnston; Sten Karlsson; Matthew Kent; Thomas Moen; Eero Niemelä; Torfinn Nome; Tor F Næsje; Panu Orell; Atso Romakkaniemi; Harald Sægrov; Kurt Urdal; Jaakko Erkinaro; Sigbjørn Lien; Craig R Primmer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Sex determination: why so many ways of doing it?

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog; Judith E Mank; Catherine L Peichel; Mark Kirkpatrick; Sarah P Otto; Tia-Lynn Ashman; Matthew W Hahn; Jun Kitano; Itay Mayrose; Ray Ming; Nicolas Perrin; Laura Ross; Nicole Valenzuela; Jana C Vamosi
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Sex-specific dominance reversal of genetic variation for fitness.

Authors:  Karl Grieshop; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  47 in total

1.  Maternal effect killing by a supergene controlling ant social organization.

Authors:  Amaury Avril; Jessica Purcell; Sébastien Béniguel; Michel Chapuisat
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Genetic growth potential, rather than phenotypic size, predicts migration phenotype in Atlantic salmon.

Authors:  Paul V Debes; Nikolai Piavchenko; Jaakko Erkinaro; Craig R Primmer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The crucial role of genome-wide genetic variation in conservation.

Authors:  Marty Kardos; Ellie E Armstrong; Sarah W Fitzpatrick; Samantha Hauser; Philip W Hedrick; Joshua M Miller; David A Tallmon; W Chris Funk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Supergene evolution via stepwise duplications and neofunctionalization of a floral-organ identity gene.

Authors:  Cuong Nguyen Huu; Barbara Keller; Elena Conti; Christian Kappel; Michael Lenhard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Inside the supergene of the bird with four sexes.

Authors:  Donna L Maney; Jennifer R Merritt; Mackenzie R Prichard; Brent M Horton; Soojin V Yi
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  A long reads-based de-novo assembly of the genome of the Arlee homozygous line reveals chromosomal rearrangements in rainbow trout.

Authors:  Guangtu Gao; Susana Magadan; Geoffrey C Waldbieser; Ramey C Youngblood; Paul A Wheeler; Brian E Scheffler; Gary H Thorgaard; Yniv Palti
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Captive-bred populations of a partially migratory salmonid fish are unlikely to maintain migratory polymorphism in natural habitats.

Authors:  Tatsuya Tanaka; Rui Ueda; Takuya Sato
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 8.  The Genomic Architecture and Evolutionary Fates of Supergenes.

Authors:  Juanita Gutiérrez-Valencia; P William Hughes; Emma L Berdan; Tanja Slotte
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  The sockeye salmon genome, transcriptome, and analyses identifying population defining regions of the genome.

Authors:  Kris A Christensen; Eric B Rondeau; David R Minkley; Dionne Sakhrani; Carlo A Biagi; Anne-Marie Flores; Ruth E Withler; Scott A Pavey; Terry D Beacham; Theresa Godin; Eric B Taylor; Michael A Russello; Robert H Devlin; Ben F Koop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Alternative migratory tactics in brown trout (Salmo trutta) are underpinned by divergent regulation of metabolic but not neurological genes.

Authors:  Robert Wynne; Louise C Archer; Stephen A Hutton; Luke Harman; Patrick Gargan; Peter A Moran; Eileen Dillane; Jamie Coughlan; Thomas F Cross; Philip McGinnity; Thomas J Colgan; Thomas E Reed
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.