Literature DB >> 19915416

Newborn screening: an appeal for improved parent education.

Audrey Tluczek1, Kate Murphy Orland, Sara Wolfgram Nick, Roger L Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study, which was part of a larger investigation of newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF), was to learn how parents were informed about NBS and obtain their suggestions for improving the process of educating parents about NBS.
METHOD: Qualitative study using directed and summative content analyses was conducted on 100 interviews with 193 parents of 100 newborns recruited from 4 clinical populations including parents of infants with (1) a CF diagnosis, (2) one CF mutation and therefore CF carriers, (3) congenital hypothyroidism, and (4) normal screening results.
RESULTS: Parents described much inconsistency in the timing of and methods used to inform them about NBS. Mothers with higher income were 3.69 times more likely to receive information before their infants' births than mothers with lower income. Parents recommended improving verbal and written communication with parents about NBS at multiple junctures from preconception to the infant's first few days of life. Parents suggested that providers take time to explain the purpose and importance of NBS, which diseases are included in testing, and when parents can expect results.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest a need to establish evidence-based guidelines for informing parents about NBS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19915416      PMCID: PMC2947955          DOI: 10.1097/JPN.0b013e3181a1bc1f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs        ISSN: 0893-2190            Impact factor:   1.638


  16 in total

Review 1.  Serving the family from birth to the medical home. A report from the Newborn Screening Task Force convened in Washington DC, May 10-11, 1999.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Incorporating newborn screening into prenatal care.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Campbell; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations.

Authors:  Diana S Catz; Nancy S Green; Jonathan N Tobin; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Penny Kyler; Ann Umemoto; Jennifer Cernoch; Roxane Brown; Fredericka Wolman
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2005

4.  Informing parents about newborn screening.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; Kathryn E Fant; Sarah J Clark
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.462

Review 5.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Michael J Rock
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.878

6.  Public participation in medical policy-making and the status of consumer autonomy: the example of newborn-screening programs in the United States.

Authors:  E H Hiller; G Landenburger; M R Natowicz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: genetic analysis.

Authors:  B Kerem; J M Rommens; J A Buchanan; D Markiewicz; T K Cox; A Chakravarti; M Buchwald; L C Tsui
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-09-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Psychosocial risk associated with newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: parents' experience while awaiting the sweat-test appointment.

Authors:  Audrey Tluczek; Rebecca L Koscik; Philip M Farrell; Michael J Rock
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Parental attitudes regarding newborn screening of PKU and DMD.

Authors:  Elizabeth Campbell; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Examination of the communication practices between state newborn screening programs and the medical home.

Authors:  Sunnah Kim; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Thomas F Tonniges
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  18 in total

1.  Newborn screening education on the internet: a content analysis of North American newborn screening program websites.

Authors:  Makda H Araia; Beth K Potter
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-04-15

2.  Parental information use in the context of newborn bloodspot screening. An exploratory mixed methods study.

Authors:  Stuart G Nicholls; K W Southern
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-02-16

3.  Design and evaluation of a decision aid for inviting parents to participate in a fragile X newborn screening pilot study.

Authors:  Donald B Bailey; Megan A Lewis; Shelly L Harris; Tracey Grant; Carla Bann; Ellen Bishop; Myra Roche; Sonia Guarda; Leah Barnum; Cynthia Powell; Bradford L Therrell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Newborn screening: education, consent, and the residual blood spot. The position of the national society of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Carrie Blout; Cate Walsh Vockley; Amy Gaviglio; Michelle Fox; Brook Croke; Lori Williamson Dean
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Genetic screening.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Beth Tarini; Nancy A Press; James P Evans
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Storage and use of Newborn Screening Blood Specimens for Research: Assessing Public Opinion in Illinois.

Authors:  Alexa Hart; Michael Petros; Joel Charrow; Claudia Nash; Catherine Wicklund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Education and parental involvement in decision-making about newborn screening: understanding goals to clarify content.

Authors:  Beth K Potter; Holly Etchegary; Stuart G Nicholls; Brenda J Wilson; Samantha M Craigie; Makda H Araia
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Informing parents about positive newborn screen results: parents' recommendations.

Authors:  Natalie Salm; Elena Yetter; Audrey Tluczek
Journal:  J Child Health Care       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 1.979

9.  Young adults' pre-existing knowledge of cystic fibrosis and sickle cell diseases: implications for newborn screening.

Authors:  Melissa Noke; Fiona Ulph
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  When the cystic fibrosis label does not fit: a modified uncertainty theory.

Authors:  Audrey Tluczek; Anne Chevalier McKechnie; Patrice A Lynam
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.