Literature DB >> 25403898

Education and parental involvement in decision-making about newborn screening: understanding goals to clarify content.

Beth K Potter1, Holly Etchegary, Stuart G Nicholls, Brenda J Wilson, Samantha M Craigie, Makda H Araia.   

Abstract

A challenge in designing effective education for parents about newborn screening (NBS) has been uncertainty about appropriate content. Arguing that the goals of education may be usefully tied to parental decision-making, we sought to: (1) explore how different ways of implementing NBS differ in their approaches to parental engagement in decision-making; (2) map the potential goals of education onto these "implementation models"; and (3) consider the content that may be needed to support these goals. The resulting conceptual framework supports the availability of comprehensive information about NBS for parents, irrespective of the model of implementation. This is largely because we argue that meeting parental expectations and preferences for communication is an important goal regardless of whether or notparents are actively involved in making a decision. Our analysis supports a flexible approach, in which some educational messages are emphasized as important for all parents to understand while others are made available depending on parents' preferences. We have begun to define the content of NBS education for parents needed to support specific goals. Further research and discussion is important to determine the most appropriate strategies for delivering the tailored approach to education that emerged from our analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25403898     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9780-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  45 in total

1.  Serving the family from birth to the medical home. Newborn screening: a blueprint for the future - a call for a national agenda on state newborn screening programs

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 2.  Analysis of educational materials and destruction/opt-out initiatives for storage and use of residual newborn screening samples.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2010-09-21

3.  Why do patients want information if not to take part in decision making?

Authors:  Neil C Manson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Informing parents about newborn screening.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; Kathryn E Fant; Sarah J Clark
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.462

5.  From public health emergency to public health service: the implications of evolving criteria for newborn screening panels.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Coleen A Boyle; Aileen Kenneson; Muin J Khoury; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Communicating about screening.

Authors:  Vikki A Entwistle; Stacy M Carter; Lyndal Trevena; Kathy Flitcroft; Les Irwig; Kirsten McCaffery; Glenn Salkeld
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-09-22

7.  Newborn screening program practices in the United States: notification, research, and consent.

Authors:  Kenneth D Mandl; Shlomit Feit; Cecilia Larson; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Informed choice and public health screening for children: the case of blood spot screening.

Authors:  Katrina M Hargreaves; Ruth J Stewart; Sandy R Oliver
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.

Authors:  S B Trinidad; S M Fullerton; E J Ludman; G P Jarvik; E B Larson; W Burke
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Factors associated with knowledge of and satisfaction with newborn screening education: a survey of mothers.

Authors:  Makda H Araia; Brenda J Wilson; Pranesh Chakraborty; Kimberly Gall; Christina Honeywell; Jennifer Milburn; Tim Ramsay; Beth K Potter
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  3 in total

1.  Consent for newborn screening: parents' and health-care professionals' experiences of consent in practice.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Stuart G Nicholls; Laure Tessier; Charlene Simmonds; Beth K Potter; Jamie C Brehaut; Daryl Pullman; Robyn Hayeems; Sari Zelenietz; Monica Lamoureux; Jennifer Milburn; Lesley Turner; Pranesh Chakraborty; Brenda Wilson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Screening of Newborns for Disorders with High Benefit-Risk Ratios Should Be Mandatory.

Authors:  Nicole Kelly; Dalia Chehayeb Makarem; Melissa P Wasserstein
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  Actionability of commercial laboratory sequencing panels for newborn screening and the importance of transparency for parental decision-making.

Authors:  Daniela M DeCristo; Laura V Milko; Julianne M O'Daniel; Ann Katherine M Foreman; Lonna F Mollison; Bradford C Powell; Cynthia M Powell; Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 11.117

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.