Literature DB >> 23881473

Newborn screening: education, consent, and the residual blood spot. The position of the national society of genetic counselors.

Carrie Blout1, Cate Walsh Vockley, Amy Gaviglio, Michelle Fox, Brook Croke, Lori Williamson Dean.   

Abstract

Newborn screening (NBS) is a minimally invasive lifesaving test. There is currently no federal mandate for NBS, thus states determine their own screening panel based on the recommendations of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborn and Children (SACHDNC), which was recently re-chartered as the Discretionary Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (DACHDNC). After NBS is completed, a couple of residual blood spots remain. While some states allow these spots to be used for public health and scientific research purposes, parents are not always informed about these additional uses. This paper addresses the National Society of Genetic Counselors' (NSGC's) position about NBS and blood spot storage/use and the rationale for these positions. The National Society of Genetic Counselors strongly supports newborn screening for the uniform screening panel of conditions recommended by the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children. NSGC also supports storage and use of blood spot samples by newborn screening laboratories and transparent policies that govern these activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23881473     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9631-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  9 in total

1.  Newborn dried blood spot screening: residual specimen storage issues.

Authors:  Bradford L Therrell; W Harry Hannon
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Citizens' values regarding research with stored samples from newborn screening in Canada.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; June C Carroll; Denise Avard; Brenda J Wilson; Julian Little; Jessica P Bytautas; Judith Allanson; Renata Axler; Yves Giguere; Pranesh Chakraborty
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Public attitudes regarding the use of residual newborn screening specimens for research.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Anderson; Louisa Stark; Aaron Goldenberg; Michelle Lewis; Matthew Burbank; Bob Wong
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Storage and use of residual dried blood spots from state newborn screening programs.

Authors:  Richard S Olney; Cynthia A Moore; Jelili A Ojodu; Mary Lou Lindegren; W Harry Hannon
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  State laws regarding the retention and use of residual newborn screening blood samples.

Authors:  Michelle H Lewis; Aaron Goldenberg; Rebecca Anderson; Erin Rothwell; Jeffrey Botkin
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Mandatory versus voluntary consent for newborn screening?

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2010-12

7.  Newborn screening: an appeal for improved parent education.

Authors:  Audrey Tluczek; Kate Murphy Orland; Sara Wolfgram Nick; Roger L Brown
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.638

8.  Committee report: Considerations and recommendations for national guidance regarding the retention and use of residual dried blood spot specimens after newborn screening.

Authors:  Bradford L Therrell; W Harry Hannon; Donald B Bailey; Edward B Goldman; Jana Monaco; Bent Norgaard-Pedersen; Sharon F Terry; Alissa Johnson; R Rodney Howell
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Factors associated with knowledge of and satisfaction with newborn screening education: a survey of mothers.

Authors:  Makda H Araia; Brenda J Wilson; Pranesh Chakraborty; Kimberly Gall; Christina Honeywell; Jennifer Milburn; Tim Ramsay; Beth K Potter
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 8.822

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Storage and use of Newborn Screening Blood Specimens for Research: Assessing Public Opinion in Illinois.

Authors:  Alexa Hart; Michael Petros; Joel Charrow; Claudia Nash; Catherine Wicklund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Screening of Newborns for Disorders with High Benefit-Risk Ratios Should Be Mandatory.

Authors:  Nicole Kelly; Dalia Chehayeb Makarem; Melissa P Wasserstein
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 3.  Bridging the Gap between Scientific Advancement and Real-World Application: Pediatric Genetic Counseling for Common Syndromes and Single-Gene Disorders.

Authors:  Julie A McGlynn; Elinor Langfelder-Schwind
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.159

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.