Literature DB >> 25410141

Storage and use of Newborn Screening Blood Specimens for Research: Assessing Public Opinion in Illinois.

Alexa Hart1, Michael Petros, Joel Charrow, Claudia Nash, Catherine Wicklund.   

Abstract

Storage and use of residual dried blood spots (DBS) from newborn screening (NBS) for research purposes has been a topic of elevated interest following high profile disputes between genetic privacy advocacy groups and state NBS programs. Our objective was to assess public opinion in Illinois regarding storage and use of residual DBS for research. Five hundred twenty-six Illinois residents completed a survey assessing attitudes about research uses for DBS, storage length, and consent issues. Over 80 % of respondents expressed agreement with questions regarding research uses of DBS. Eighty-three percent of respondents were in favor of storage for at least one year with 44 % favoring indefinite storage. Respondents with higher educational attainment were more likely to support research use of DBS and less likely to desire contact for each future study (P < 0.05). Black respondents were less likely than white respondents to express agreement for the use of DBS for research or to favor long-term storage (P < 0.05). Support was high for storage and use of DBS in our sample. Consent was important and respondents wanted choices about participation. Forty-two percent of respondents were not aware of NBS prior to this survey, highlighting a need for greater education about this public health program. Trust in the public health service of NBS must be protected through transparency in the policy process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25410141     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9788-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  26 in total

1.  Citizens' values regarding research with stored samples from newborn screening in Canada.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; June C Carroll; Denise Avard; Brenda J Wilson; Julian Little; Jessica P Bytautas; Judith Allanson; Renata Axler; Yves Giguere; Pranesh Chakraborty
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Considerations and recommendations for national guidance regarding the retention and use of residual dried blood spots specimens after newborn screening.

Authors:  Georgirene D Vladutiu
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.797

3.  Status of newborn screening programs in the United States.

Authors:  Bradford L Therrell; Alissa Johnson; Donna Williams
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Newborn blood collections. Science gold mine, ethical minefield.

Authors:  Jennifer Couzin-Frankel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Guidelines for the retention, storage, and use of residual dried blood spot samples after newborn screening analysis: statement of the Council of Regional Networks for Genetic Services.

Authors:  B L Therrell; W H Hannon; K A Pass; F Lorey; C Brokopp; J Eckman; M Glass; R Heidenreich; S Kinney; S Kling; G Landenburger; F J Meaney; E R McCabe; S Panny; M Schwartz; E Shapira
Journal:  Biochem Mol Med       Date:  1996-04

6.  Attitudes about the use of newborn dried blood spots for research: a survey of underrepresented parents.

Authors:  Kristin S Hendrix; Eric M Meslin; Aaron E Carroll; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.107

7.  Stored Guthrie cards as DNA "banks".

Authors:  J E McEwen; P R Reilly
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Pediatric biobanks: approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up.

Authors:  Aaron J Goldenberg; Sara Chandros Hull; Jeffrey R Botkin; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Parental attitudes regarding newborn screening of PKU and DMD.

Authors:  Elizabeth Campbell; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Community perspectives on public health biobanking: an analysis of community meetings on the Michigan BioTrust for Health.

Authors:  Daniel B Thiel; Tevah Platt; Jodyn Platt; Susan B King; Sharon L R Kardia
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.