Literature DB >> 22109819

Newborn screening education on the internet: a content analysis of North American newborn screening program websites.

Makda H Araia1, Beth K Potter.   

Abstract

The Internet is a potentially important medium for communication about public health programs including newborn screening. This study explores whether the information available on official newborn screening program websites is consistent with existing guidelines regarding educational content for parents. We conducted a systematic search of the public websites of newborn screening programs in the US and Canada, identifying web pages and downloadable brochures that contained educational information. Two researchers independently reviewed all documents to determine the extent to which they included 14 key recommended educational messages. We identified 85 documents containing educational information on 46 US and 6 Canadian newborn screening program websites. The documents contained from 1 to 14 of the recommended messages. The majority of identified materials emphasized the importance and benefits of screening. The differences between US and Canadian materials were related to the importance of parental involvement in follow-up and issues of consent and storage of blood spots. Our findings are consistent with studies of non-web-based newborn screening education materials. The results emphasize the need for further evaluation of newborn screening education, including internet-based resources, particularly in terms of the impact of particular messages on parental attitudes and behaviors.

Year:  2011        PMID: 22109819      PMCID: PMC3186036          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-011-0046-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  25 in total

1.  Serving the family from birth to the medical home. Newborn screening: a blueprint for the future - a call for a national agenda on state newborn screening programs

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Information about screening - is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice?

Authors:  A E Raffle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them.

Authors:  Shelia R Cotten; Sipi S Gupta
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Informing parents about newborn screening.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; Kathryn E Fant; Sarah J Clark
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.462

5.  From public health emergency to public health service: the implications of evolving criteria for newborn screening panels.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Coleen A Boyle; Aileen Kenneson; Muin J Khoury; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Newborn screening in Canada - Are we out of step?

Authors:  William B Hanley
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Parental education and children's online health information seeking: beyond the digital divide debate.

Authors:  Shanyang Zhao
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse; David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Robert T Croyle; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005 Dec 12-26

Review 9.  A review of the psychosocial effects of false-positive results on parents and current communication practices in newborn screening.

Authors:  J Hewlett; S E Waisbren
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 4.982

10.  Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.

Authors:  S B Trinidad; S M Fullerton; E J Ludman; G P Jarvik; E B Larson; W Burke
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  7 in total

1.  Education and parental involvement in decision-making about newborn screening: understanding goals to clarify content.

Authors:  Beth K Potter; Holly Etchegary; Stuart G Nicholls; Brenda J Wilson; Samantha M Craigie; Makda H Araia
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Internet use by parents of infants with positive newborn screens.

Authors:  Jane M DeLuca; Margaret H Kearney; Sally A Norton; Georgianne L Arnold
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 4.982

3.  Consent for newborn screening: parents' and health-care professionals' experiences of consent in practice.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Stuart G Nicholls; Laure Tessier; Charlene Simmonds; Beth K Potter; Jamie C Brehaut; Daryl Pullman; Robyn Hayeems; Sari Zelenietz; Monica Lamoureux; Jennifer Milburn; Lesley Turner; Pranesh Chakraborty; Brenda Wilson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  What parents want to know about the storage and use of residual newborn bloodspots.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Erin Rothwell; Rebecca A Anderson; Aaron Goldenberg; Miriam Kuppermann; Siobhan M Dolan; Nancy C Rose; Louisa Stark
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Stakeholder attitudes towards the role and application of informed consent for newborn bloodspot screening: a study protocol.

Authors:  S G Nicholls; L Tessier; H Etchegary; J C Brehaut; B K Potter; R Z Hayeems; P Chakraborty; J Marcadier; J Milburn; D Pullman; L Turner; B J Wilson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Parental decision-making and acceptance of newborn bloodspot screening: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Stuart G Nicholls; Kevin W Southern
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Factors associated with knowledge of and satisfaction with newborn screening education: a survey of mothers.

Authors:  Makda H Araia; Brenda J Wilson; Pranesh Chakraborty; Kimberly Gall; Christina Honeywell; Jennifer Milburn; Tim Ramsay; Beth K Potter
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 8.822

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.